According to one major language theory, how did different groups develop their own languages?
Answer: There are two main theories that explain how different groups developed their own languages. The major one is that humans at some point in time evolved a language acquisition device.
I hope it helps, Regards.
Answer: He is credited with bringing Christianity to parts of Ireland and was probably partly responsible for the Christianization of the Picts and Anglo-Saxons.
Explanation:
There were many aspects that they inspired. Religion was one certainly where many religions were inspired by Mesopotamian or Egyptian gods and stories about them. Another is language and cultural heritage. Another is their knowledge of urbanization and agriculture that enabled them to focus their endeavors on other more spiritual things since they had this covered.
<h2>
Answer:</h2>
<u>B. Connecticut colony</u> was primarily established for financial gains
.
<h2>
Explanation:</h2>
Among the 13 established colonies, Connecticut was the 5th and it became a colony in 1637 after the English-Dutch struggles. Population in the coastal area started the economy of the colony through fishing and whaling. It gained momentum with other people branching into building ships and shipping.
In the other parts of Connecticut colony, there was a trade of fur, rum, whiskey, timber products, livestock products, horsed maple syrup, etc. The economic boost was also a result of prohibiting import supplies from Britain. This improved manufacturing and entrepreneurship and also boosted other trade skills.
Answer:
A. limit free speech.
Explanation:
The first amendment of United States constitution protect the citizens' ability for "Free speech". This law was intended to give the citizens with the power to protest the government. But many people interpret it as the ability to say whatever they want to other people without consequences.
The "clear and present danger' test was devised by the Supreme Court. The consist of standards that law enforcement can follow to differentiate "Free speech" and assault.
As a general rule, If the speech that given by a person either threatening the welfare of individuals, disrupt public order, or agitating other individuals to be a target for attack, that speech would no longer be protected by the 1st amendment.
