1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lyrx [107]
3 years ago
13

Does the existence of many and conflicting moral viewpoints mean that, logically, there are no answers to moral questions? Expla

in your answer using philosophical reasoning and the terminology of logic.
History
1 answer:
Leno4ka [110]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The existence of many and conflicting moral viewpoints means that, logically, there are no answers to moral questions but the individual has to develop their own moral concepts that are going to be applied when it decides on an ethical issue.

Ethics studies the moral acts of human beings. Morals study the decisions that stem from the conscience. So there is no logic or reasoning because every individual has its set of moral rules or standards, depending on its culture, race, ethnicity, values, or traditions.  So when the individual is about to make a decision, he or she is aware that there is going to be consequences from that decision and the individual has to live by those consequences.

You might be interested in
What was the purpose of Andrew Jackson's message to Congress "On Indian Removal"?
grandymaker [24]
For the Indians to be gone so there are no more people of color
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Egypt and Nubia relied on the Nile river because it:
defon

Answer:

Gave them a lot of resources like water, good farming soil, and was believed it was a Sacred RIver for the Egyptians.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How did Theodore Roosevelt’s Corollary influence US foreign policy?
Goshia [24]
How did Theodore Roosevelt’s Corollary influence US foreign policy? Answer: The way that Roosevelt’s corollary influenced the US foreign policy was by displaying how the United States would take a more aggressive role in the world. Therefore the correct answer to this question from the options shown above would be choice D). I hope it helps, Regards.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the french women try to change their role in french society in the late 1800's
Bas_tet [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

Historians since the late 20th century have debated how women shared in the French Revolution and what long-term impact it had on French women. Women had no political rights in pre-Revolutionary France; they were considered "passive" citizens, forced to rely on men to determine what was best for them. That changed dramatically in theory as there seemingly were great advances in feminism. Feminism emerged in Paris as part of a broad demand for social and political reform. The women demanded equality to men and then moved on to a demand for the end of male domination. Their chief vehicle for agitation were pamphlets and women's clubs, especially the Society of Revolutionary Republican Women. However, the Jacobin (radical) element in power abolished all the women's clubs in October 1793 and arrested their leaders. The movement was crushed. Devance explains the decision in terms of the emphasis on masculinity in wartime, Marie Antoinette's bad reputation for feminine interference in state affairs, and traditional male supremacy.[1] A decade later the Napoleonic Code confirmed and perpetuated women's second-class status.[2]

8 0
4 years ago
Make an argument for this.
Shalnov [3]

Argument:

<em>The creation of the Constitution represented a remarkable example of constructive compromise because</em><u> it is a compromise between the government and the people, that states that people should act in a certain way to maintain peace and that the government should protect the people's interests and rights. </u>

A historical example that proves that the Constitution represented an example of constructive compromise is the Three - Fifths Compromise, where the framers of the Constitution reached to an agreement to represent three out of every five slaves in a state to determine their total population for legislative representation and taxes purposes. This Compromise was constructive because both slave states that had little free population and free states with a bigger population would be equally represented by the United States House of Representatives by the next ten years.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which item was a byproduct of the Columbian exchange
    8·1 answer
  • What was Washington's approach to foreign policy, and why was it so complicated?
    15·1 answer
  • The constitution ensures domestic tranquility provides <br> for the common
    8·1 answer
  • Why did colonists in South Carolina appeal to the King to become a royal colony?
    10·1 answer
  • What economic reasons contributed to the beginning of the French Revolution?
    11·1 answer
  • Boreal forests in Siberia Russia are most similar to what area in North America?
    6·1 answer
  • Select the THREE types of representatives used by the United States in foreign countries.
    14·1 answer
  • How did the U.S. combat the Soviet blockade of West Berlin?
    6·2 answers
  • :( help :(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
    9·1 answer
  • Which of of the descriptions below matches this political cartoon the best?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!