1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kvv77 [185]
3 years ago
13

Early American private banks were allowed to print paper money called bank

Law
2 answers:
Whitepunk [10]3 years ago
7 0
Hi!

The answer is in fact A. Notes

Hope this helps !
lapo4ka [179]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

It should be notes

Explanation:

"I have a few bank notes at home" sounds better

You might be interested in
4. दिए गए शब्दों में से उचित शब्द का प्रयोग करके रिक्त स्थानों की पूर्ति करें - यह______विद्यालय है।
lapo4ka [179]

Answer:

(c) mine

Explanation:

Fill in the blanks using the appropriate word from the given words - it is ______ school.

1 point

(A) me.

(B) vote.

(C) mine.

(D) choice.

6 0
3 years ago
What is environmental studies??
andrew11 [14]

Answer:

another fake id of someone who put same pfp as u.

and name also

or it can be ur id.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!! 100 POINTS!!! For this project, you have the opportunity to be the author and write brief newspaper arti
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:

Manufacturers are used to defending strict product liability actions when plaintiffs claim that their products are defective. But in the opioid litigation, plaintiffs have filed something else: more than 2,500 public nuisance cases so far.

Governmental entities across the country are filing suits alleging that opioid manufacturers deceptively marketed their legal, opioid-based pain medications to understate the medication’s addictive qualities and to overstate its effectiveness in treating pain. In addition, plaintiffs allege that opioid distributors failed to properly monitor how frequently the medication was prescribed and failed to stop filling prescription orders from known “pill mills.” The complaints claim that manufacturer defendants’ deceptive marketing schemes and distributor defendants’ failure to monitor led more people to become addicted to painkillers, which led to people turning to illegal opioids. The legal argument here is that the defendants’ actions in concert interfered with an alleged public right against unwarranted illness and addition. But is public nuisance law likely to be a successful avenue for prosecuting these types of mass tort claims? It has not been in the past.

This is the first of two posts that will address how plaintiffs have historically used public nuisance law to prosecute mass tort claims and how the plaintiffs in the current opioid litigation may fare.

Overview of Public Nuisance Law

In most states, a public nuisance is “an unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public.”[1] This definition is often broken down into four elements: (1) the defendant’s affirmative conduct caused (2) an unreasonable interference (3) with a right common to the general public (4) that is abatable.

Courts have interpreted these elements in different ways. For example, courts in Rhode Island and California have disagreed about when a public nuisance is abatable: the Rhode Island Supreme Court held that this element is satisfied only if the defendant had control over what caused the nuisance when the injury occurred, while the a California Court of Appeal held that the plaintiff need not prove this element at all.[2] And while the federal district court in Ohio handling the opioid multidistrict litigation (MDL) has held that the right to be free from unwarranted addiction is a public right,[3] the Supreme Court of Illinois held that the right to be “free from unreasonable jeopardy to health” is a private right and cannot be the basis of a public nuisance claim.[4]

Roots of Public Nuisance Law in Mass Tort Cases

Plaintiffs litigating mass tort cases have turned to public nuisance law over the past decades. In the 1980s and 1990s, plaintiffs unsuccessfully attempted to use it to hold asbestos manufacturers liable.[5] In one case, plaintiffs alleged that defendants created a nuisance by producing an asbestos-laced product that caused major health repercussions for a portion of the population. Plaintiffs argued that North Dakota nuisance law did not require defendants to have the asbestos-laced products within their control when the injury to the consumer occurred. Explicitly rejecting this theory, the Eighth Circuit held that North Dakota nuisance law required the defendant to have control over the product and found that defendant in the case before it did not have control over the asbestos-laced products because when the injury occurred, the products had already been distributed to consumers. The Eighth Circuit warned that broadening nuisance law to encompass these claims “would in effect totally rewrite” tort law, morphing nuisance law into “a monster that would devour in one gulp the entire law of tort.”[6]

3 0
2 years ago
Which matches which?????????
Free_Kalibri [48]

Answer:g7h6f5e4d3b2a1

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
What is the only branch of United States government that is not elected
BlackZzzverrR [31]

Answer:

the answer would be the 'Executive Branch'

Explanation:

Unlike members of Congress, the president and vice president are not elected directly by the people every four years.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A prominent leader in promoting the settlement house movement was
    10·1 answer
  • What is A group of citizens who meet to investigate charges coming from preliminary hearings ?
    6·1 answer
  • 3-38 Alimony. As a result of their divorce, Fred agreed to pay alimony to Tammy of $20,000 per year. The payments are to cease i
    5·1 answer
  • Some Police Officer have issues with ethics and entitlement when they are doing the wrong thing.
    11·1 answer
  • Once the House or Representatives has impeached the president, it is up to which of the selection listed below to convict and re
    8·2 answers
  • What forensic scientist discovered how to use a comparison microscope to match bullets found at a crime scene?
    10·1 answer
  • Bem-vindo à Seção 3! Na audiência UNA (única), que ocorreu no dia 2/2/2020, às 9h, ambas as partes compareceram acompanhadas de
    12·1 answer
  • Federal district court judges hear A. mostly criminal cases, with an occasional civil case. B. criminal cases only. C. civil cas
    5·1 answer
  • What is an example of an event that might require a public affairs professional?
    13·1 answer
  • In contract law, the term consideration refers to the serious thought that underlies a party's intent to enter into a contract.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!