Answer:
<h3>c. Punitive damages.</h3>
Explanation:
Through the allocation of Punitive damages, it provides the distressed plaintiff the right to punish and deter the defendant from engaging in the same offense in the future.
Those who support punitive damages contends that such provisions would help the society from witnessing similar offences from the same person or an organisation in the future. In simple terms, punitive damages are like deterrence that will keep a check on the offender from making the same offence in the future.
It is a retributive action that tries to sends a message that offenders will be prosecuted with heavy penalty and consequences.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
I would want to believe A, Ginsburg was a women's rights champion and the court's second female justice., is the answer because it explains more about the person in question, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, that is.
While the other options were more about what she said or did, A in particular is talking about who Ruth is, and even went as much as listing an accolade of hers, that she's the court's second female justice.
So, I go with A
Answer:
in our unique judicial system, courts are protected from the influence of other branches of government, as well as shifting popular opinion. ... This allows the judiciary to make decisions based on what is right under the law, without political or personal consequences.
Explanation:
Answer:the government cannot discriminate non believers, the government cannot establish an official religion, the government cannot favor one religion over another
