<span>Making a loud, confused noise; uproarious.</span>
I think that the changes will not be visible in the router running the configuration. This is because they are not part of the router configuration. The version 5.x signature is more advantageous it has an additional signature risk rating feature and it supports encrypted signature parameters. <span />
The dimension of the length and width of the rectangle with the given perimeter are 33ft and 16.5ft respectively.
<h3>What are the dimensions of the rectangle?</h3>
Perimeter of rectangle is expressed as;
P = 2( l + w )
Given that;
- Perimeter P = 99ft
- Let width w = x
- Length l = 2x
We substitute into the formular above.
P = 2( l + w )
99ft = 2( x + 2x )
99ft = 2x + 4x
99ft = 6x
x = 99ft/6
x = 16.5ft
Width = x = 16.5ft
Length = 2x = 2( 16.5ft ) = 33ft
Therefore, the dimension of the length and width of the rectangle with the given perimeter are 33ft and 16.5ft respectively.
Learn more about rectangles here: brainly.com/question/27612962
#SPJ1
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The complete question is given thus:
Suppose that computer literacy among people ages 40 and older is being studied and that the accompanying tables describes the probability distribution for four randomly selected people, where x is the number that are computer literate. Is it unusual to find four computer literates among four randomly selected people?
x P(x)
0 0.16
1 0.25
2 0.36
3 0.15
4 0.08
ANSWER:
The odds that this will occur according to the chart are 0.08, or 8%, so although this is unlikely, it's not terribly unusual.
⇒ NO
So from the following we can say it is not unusual to find four (4) computer literates among four randomly selected people.
ok, so P(1) + P(2) + P(3) + P(4) + P(0) = 0.16+0.25+0.36+0.15+0.08 = 1
Whereas the chance of finding four (4) out of four (4) computer iteration is low when compared to other factors.
cheers i hope this helped !!
Step-by-step explanation:
Hey there!
The given point is (8,-3) as (x1,y1) and slope (m) = -3/4.
<u>Note</u><u>:</u><u> </u><u>use</u><u> </u><u>one</u><u> </u><u>po</u><u>int</u><u> formula</u><u> for</u><u> </u><u>f</u><u>inding</u><u> </u><u>the</u><u> </u><u>eq</u><u>uation</u><u>.</u>

<u>Pu</u><u>t</u><u> all</u><u> values</u><u>.</u>
<u>
</u>
<u>Sim</u><u>plify</u><u> it</u><u>.</u>
<u>
</u>
<u>
</u>
<u>
</u>
<u>
</u>
<u>There</u><u>fore</u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>the</u><u> </u><u>equation</u><u> is</u><u>;</u><u> </u><u>y</u><u> </u><u>=</u><u> </u><u>-</u><u>3</u><u>/</u><u>4</u><u>x</u><u>+</u><u>3</u><u>.</u>
<em><u>Hope</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>it</u></em><em><u> helps</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>