C.
y - 65 = -10(x - 6)
is what i say it is but im not for sure, so sry if im wrong.
The <u>correct answer</u> is:
As x→-∞, y→-3.
As x→∞, y→∞.
Explanation:
As our values of x get further into the negative numbers, the value of 2ˣ will approach 0. This is because raising a number to a negative exponent "flips" the number below the denominator and raises it to a power; we end up with smaller and smaller fractions, eventually so small that they nearly equal 0.
This will make the value of the function 0-3=-3.
As x gets larger and larger (towards ∞), the value of y, 2ˣ, continues to grow as well. Since it continues to grow exponentially, we say the value approaches ∞.
Answer:
See explanation below.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's say,
represents the sale price of radio.
Then the marked price of the radio is ![1.25x](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=1.25x)
The cost price of the radio is ![(1.25x)(0.70)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%281.25x%29%280.70%29)
The discount is simply 25% because the radio is being sold at 25% less then the marked price.
The gain percent is given as:
![\frac{x-1.25x\times \:0.70}{x}\times 100\\\\=12.5\%](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7Bx-1.25x%5Ctimes%20%5C%3A0.70%7D%7Bx%7D%5Ctimes%20100%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D12.5%5C%25)
The radio is being sold at 12.5% gain.
Best Regards!
Answer:
The bottom table.
Step-by-step explanation:
It's the only one that shows options for heads and tails for every number.
Answer:
Manuel made his first mistake in step 2 leading to the continuous mistakes
Final answer=185
Step-by-step explanation:
Manuel made at least one error as she found the value of this expression. 2(-20) + 3[5/4(-20)] + 5[2/5(50)] + 4(50) Step 1: 2(-20) + 3(-25) + 5(20) + 4(50) Step 2: (3 + 2)(-20 + -25) + (5 + 4)(20 + 50) Step 3: 5(-45) + 9(70) Step 4: -225 + 630 Step 5: 405 Identify the step in which Chris made her first error. After identifying the step with the first error, write the corrected steps and find the final answer.
2(-20) + 3[5/4(-20)] + 5[2/5(50)] + 4(50)
Step 1: 2(-20) + 3(-25) + 5(20) + 4(50)
Step 2: -40 - 75 + 100 +
200
Step 3: -115 + 300
Step 4: 185
Manuel made his first error in step 2 by combining two different terms into one as he has done
(3 + 2)(-20 + -25) and also (5 + 4)(20 + 50)
Step 2: (3 + 2)(-20 + -25) + (5 + 4)(20 + 50)
Step 3: 5(-45) + 9(70) Step 4: -225 + 630 Step 5: 405
He should have evaluated the terms separately as I have done above, giving us 185 as the final answer in contrast to his 405 final answer.