1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ohaa [14]
3 years ago
7

Which of the following best defines the concept of total war?

History
1 answer:
Ahat [919]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Option 2

Explanation:

Total war is when a nation uses every resource in their power to destroy the opposing force, it also means that a nation will not only attack the opposing nation's military, but also civilians and anything in their path. The idea is often used as a "last resort" to prevent the other country from being able to continue to fight.

Please mark as brainliest :)

You might be interested in
Write your 500-word, narrative-style legend of a Native American tribe of your choosing here.
bazaltina [42]

Answer:

The Cherokee were the mountaineers of the South, holding the entire Allegheny region from the interlocking head-streams of the Kanawha and Tennessee southward almost to the site of Atlanta, and from the Blue Ridge on the east to the Cumberland range on the west, a territory comprising an area of about 40,000 square miles, now included in the states of Virginia, Tennessee, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama. Their principal towns were upon the headwaters of the Savannah, Hiwassee, and Tuckasegee, and along the whole length of Little Tennessee to its junction with the mainstream. Itsâtĭ, or Echota, on the south bank of Little Tennessee, a few miles above the mouth of Tellico River, in Tennessee, was commonly considered the capital of the Nation. As the advancing whites pressed upon them from the east and northeast the more exposed towns were destroyed or abandoned and new settlements were formed lower down Tennessee and on the upper branches of the Chattahoochee and the Coosa.

As is always the case with tribal geography, there were no fixed boundaries, and on every side, the Cherokee frontiers were contested by rival claimants. In Virginia, there is reason to believe, the tribe was held in check in the early days by the Powhatan and the Monacan. On the east and southeast, the Tuscarora and Catawba were their inveterate enemies, with hardly even a momentary truce within the historic period; and evidence goes to show that the Sara or Cheraw was full as hostile. On the south, there was hereditary war with the Creeks, who claimed nearly the whole of upper Georgia as theirs by original possession, but who were being gradually pressed down toward the Gulf until, through the mediation of the United States, a treaty was finally made fixing the boundary between the two tribes along a line running about due west from the mouth of Broad River on the Savannah. Toward the west, the Chickasaw on the lower Tennessee and the Shawano on the Cumberland repeatedly turned back the tide of Cherokee invasion from the rich central valleys, while the powerful Iroquois in the far north set up an almost unchallenged claim of paramount lordship from the Ottawa river of Canada southward at least to the Kentucky River. On the other hand, by their defeat of the Creeks and expulsion of the Shawano, the Cherokee made good the claim which they asserted to all the lands from upper Georgia to the Ohio River, including the rich hunting grounds of Kentucky. Holding as they did the great mountain barrier between the English settlements on the coast and the French or Spanish garrisons along the Mississippi and Ohio, their geographic position, no less than their superior number, would have given them the balance of power in the South but for looseness of tribal organization in striking contrast to the compactness of the Iroquois league, by which for more than a century the French power was held in check in the north. The English, indeed, found it convenient to recognize certain chiefs as supreme in the tribe, but the only real attempt to weld the whole Cherokee Nation into a political unit was that made by the French agent, Priber, about 1736, which failed from its premature discovery by the English. We frequently find their kingdom divided against itself, their very number preventing unity of action, while still giving them importance above that of neighboring tribes.

Explanation:

this is 571 words. hope this helped you.

6 0
3 years ago
how did the Ku Klux Klan that emerged during this time differ from the original after the civil war? Why would they come back? E
Kruka [31]

This emergent again was a reflex action against the industrialization, urbanization, and immigration

<u>Explanation:</u>

The Ku Klux Clan is a racial organization who is racists and they are people who brutally murder people of different race. They emerged this time again in 1920’s showing their full vengeance against the Afro-Americans, Jews, and Catholics.

They wished to keep the Afro-Americans in permanent subjugation below the Whites.The Klan’s men were white protestant people who felt that the immigrants took away the jobs and caused a racial impurity among the white Americans.  The KKK were at the peak during the Indiana politics and it was a native borne with whites of different social and economic level.

6 0
3 years ago
in what ways did islamic art and literature show diversity, ans what important trait do they have in common
Natali [406]

The most distinguishing trait of Islamic art and literature is Unity in Diversity. As Islamic culture was  influenced by encounters with other cultures and religions, like those of the Byzantine empire, Jerusalem as well as local trends in Syria, Jordan and Palestine, its art and literature shows this influence in its diverse forms. Islamic literature was also inspired and adapted from stories of diverse cultures, like the Turkish, the Persian as well as Indian.

Common traits in art included calligraphy on different mediums,  geometrical motifs, domes and minarets. In literature, the absence and intolerance of 'fiction' as advised by the Quran was a common trait.

4 0
3 years ago
How long did the old kingdom period of Egyptian civilization last?
tankabanditka [31]
The First Intermediate Period, often described as a “dark period” in ancient Egyptian history, spanned approximately three hundred years<span>after the end of the Old Kingdom from circa 2181 BC to 2055 BC. It included the Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, and part of the Eleventh Dynasties.....This is what i found on google. hope it helps

</span>
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What five criteria help democracy succeed
blondinia [14]
The five criteria which help democracy to successed are as follows:
1. wide spread education.
2.Citizen participation
3. Existence of strong civil society
4. Favorable economy
5.Existence of social consensus. 
These factors work together to produce strong democracy government.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who suffered when Louis XIV revoked the Edict of Nantes?
    7·2 answers
  • Which sentence uses an action verb? A. Those baby ducks were so fuzzy. B. Ducks' feet are webbed. C. The duckling is very small.
    13·2 answers
  • . How did the Civil War lead to the Second Industrial Revolution in the United States
    15·1 answer
  • What was the main purpose of the Navigation Acts?
    7·1 answer
  • What did the amnesty mean for former Confederates?
    6·2 answers
  • The new boundary line set by the adams-onis treaty had which of these effects?
    7·2 answers
  • European settlers often associated American Indians with _____ stereotypes. One such stereotype was that American Indians were
    12·1 answer
  • What were the three parts of the war strategy of the north (the union)
    9·2 answers
  • How did the Leo frank trail conclude
    11·1 answer
  • ANYONE PLEASE HELP ME WITH THIS ANYONE WHO CAN ANSWER THIS I WILL MARK YOU AS THE BRAINLIEST!HELP ME PLEASE:(
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!