What prompted the United States to send supplies to Israel during the Yom Kippur War of 1973 is the <span>Egypt’s support of Syria.
</span>In 1972, Anwar el-Sadat ousted and excluded 20,000 Soviet advisers from Egypt and started new diplomatic channels with Washington<span>, D.C., which, as Israel’s key ally, would be a vital mediator in any future peace talks. Sadat formed a new alliance with Syria, and an attack on Israel was planned.
</span>When the fourth Arab-Israeli war opened on the 6th of October 1973, a lot of Israel’s soldiers were away from their posts observing Yom Kippur--- Day of Atonement. Arab armies made a strong impression on their advances with their up-to-date Soviet weaponry. Soon, Iraqi forces joined the war, and Syria was supported by Jordan.
Many days after, Israel was fully mobilized. The Defense Forces of Israel started beating back the Arab gains at a huge cost to soldiers and equipment.
Airlift of arms of United States aided Israel’s cause, but as a tactic signal of the United States' sympathy for Egypt, President Richard Nixon (1913-94) delayed the emergency military aid for a week.
An Egyptian-Israeli cease-fire was secured by the United Nations on October 25,
Lincoln's 1857 Emancipation Proclamation warned that the issue of slavery could destroy the nation.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
This proclamation was given by Abraham Lincoln when the civil war was in its third year. The proclamation changed the status of almost 3.5 million slaves. The slaves were freed post the proclamation.
Slavery was a major issue that had led to the civil war and this proclamation changed the manner in which slavery was viewed.
The proclamation made freeing the slaves an explicit goal of the war. The proclamation did not lead to immediate abolition of slavery but ensured that most of the slaves in the Union were freed.
Answer:
Hey
Explanation:
- The army would be very advanced for its time.
- I would train my army very perfectly n make them fit
- I would use the best weapons
- Also the best armour.
If I would be so I would do the above one ..
<em><u>Hope</u></em><em><u> it's</u></em><em><u> helpful</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>
<em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>if </u></em><em><u>so</u></em><em><u> mark</u></em><em><u> me</u></em><em><u> as</u></em><em><u> brainlist</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>
<em><u>also</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>thank</u></em><em><u> me</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u>.</u></em>
Answer: Ture
Explanation: Americans needed to conserve what they had because it was extermely hard to get some stuff because a lot of it was being sent to the Front Lines.
The correct answer is:
Allied: the United Kingdom; Central Powers: Germany.
The Allies had a lot more potential wealth to be spent on WW1. It has been estimated that the Allies spent $147 billion on the war while the Central Powers invested only $61 billion. Britain and its Empire on the Allies side spent $47 billion while Germany spent $45 billion.
