The critique of the movie "Psycho" has a formal tone, the content is very detailed, and it has a descriptive and argumentative style.
<h3>What is the tone?</h3>
The tone is the attitude of the reader towards the subject of the text. The tone of the critique of the movie "Psycho" can be classified as formal because the author uses words such as "well-constructed screenplay" or "The acting though was exemplary" that are part of the formal language.
<h3>What is the content of the critique?</h3>
The content is quite detailed because the author of this review refers to the scenes, the actors, and the characters represented by them, among other aspects.
<h3>What is the style of the critique?</h3>
This has a descriptive and argumentative style because even if the author is describing the movie he/she also wants to tell others this movie is a good movie.
Learn more about critiques in: brainly.com/question/22450474
Answer: Anger issues
Explanation:
The words knife and chopping are surely not something that is using when it comes to teaching and class. It is against the school law and it is very dangerous and punished harshly. Mr. Chan is fighting anger issues because he is hurting himself because of the irritation that he gets from the kids. He can't control it and that is why he is doing something like this.
The significance is that Ernest is a name and Earnest is synonymous with honest. The girl wants to marry someone who is called Ernest because she believes it is a great name. However, in order to be close to her, the men have to be earnest too, but they are lying about their names so they're not being earnest, or Ernest, but are pretending to be Ernest and earnest.
Pickering is the person that treats a flower girl like a duchess.
Whereas Higgins treats a duchess like a flower girl.