D It would no longer have the insulation of the green house effect from the atmosphere
Answer:
Aversive conditioning
Explanation:
Aversion conditioning is the conditioning process that is used to avoid undesired behavior. The stimuli are associated with the noxious stimulus or undesired stimulus to avoid undesired behavior or response. This is a therapy that is used to reduce the behavior that is undesirable for all.
Thus Paul gets an injection to avoid excessive smoking. This injection is given because Paul can avoid that undesirable behavior that is not accepted in the society.
This conditioning is useful in another disorder such as OCD.
Answer: strengthens the HONOR system.
Explanation: When ethical psychologists share the results of their research data with other professionals, it allows verification of results and therefore strengthens the honor system.
The honor system is a system of conduct in which participants are trusted not to take unfair advantage of others.
Answer:
Goal displacement
Explanation:
Goal Displacement is a situation in which the original goals of the organization are superseded by the new goals which are developed during the course of time. Goal displacement can happen because of many reasons and at many levels, with the only objective of ensuring the growth and prosperity of the company.
Organizations develop initial goals to be achieved and for achieving them some methods and rules are devised and followed. But during the course of time, these rules and procedures may become primary and more important than the original goals. The new goals may serve the interest of the employees or the management of the organization. This is an inevitable threat organizations face.
In cases where the organization's original goals are already achieved or when the original goals are no longer necessary, goal displacement has positive effects which help to organization to direct its energy elsewhere.
Best answer: B. A state is sued for intentionally creating a Congressional district with a majority African-American population.
Background/context:
The landmark case regarding voting district lines was <em>Baker v. Carr </em>(1962), which pertained to voting districts in Tennessee. The plaintiff, Charles Baker, argued that voting districts, which had not been redrawn since 1901, heavily favored rural locations over urban centers which had grown significantly since then. Joe Carr was Secretary of State for Tennessee at the time, so was named in the case in regard to voting district lines as drawn by the state legislature. The Supreme Court ruled that voting districts were not merely a political matter to be decided by legislatures, but that they were subject to review by federal courts to determine their fairness.
The matter of redrawing district lines has come up in court cases recently as some state legislatures, when dominated by one political party, have "gerrymandered" district lines to try to maintain continued prominence for their party. Legislatures dominated by one party may redraw district lines (following the US Census) in ways that favor their party's candidates maintaining an advantage. Earlier this year, lawsuits were filed against the states of Alabama, Georgia, and Louisiana, accusing those states of trying to isolate African-American voters to limit their impact on Congressional elections. According to <em>Courthouse News Service </em>(June 14, 2018), "In Georgia, Alabama and Louisiana, local lawyers filed lawsuits in federal court against each states’ Secretary of States ... alleging the Republican efforts in 2011 to redraw congressional lines left many of the minority black voters packed into one district and breaking up pockets of others."
