1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tiny-mole [99]
3 years ago
6

Union troops continued to occupy Fort Sumter in 1860 because​

History
2 answers:
Mashutka [201]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

the United States had not officially recognized the right to secede

Explanation:

hope this helps

hram777 [196]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Union troops continued to occupy Fort Sumter in 1860 because  the    Confederacy could not seize federal property. as the North and South had already agreed not to seize each other's forts.

<em>forgive</em>

You might be interested in
Concerned with a case in which a group of students wore black armbands to school in protest of the Vietnam war, Tinker v. Des Mo
larisa [96]

Answer:

On Feb. 24, 1969, the court ruled 7-2 that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

The court found that the First Amendment applied to public schools, and school officials could not censor student speech unless it disrupted the educational process. Because wearing a black armband was not disruptive, the court held that the First Amendment protected the right of students to wear them.

The court’s majority opinion, written by Justice Abe Fortas, went on to affirm the freedom that young people have under the Constitution:

In our system, state-operated schools may not be enclaves of totalitarianism. School officials do not possess absolute authority over their students. Students… are possessed of fundamental rights which the State must respect, just as they themselves must respect their obligations to the State. In our system, students may not be regarded as closed-circuit recipients of only that which the State chooses to communicate. They may not be confined to the expression of those sentiments that are officially approved. In the absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate their speech, students are entitled to freedom of expression of their views

Explanation:

Tinker v. Des Moines is a historic Supreme Court ruling from 1969 that cemented students’ rights to free speech in public schools.

Mary Beth Tinker was a 13-year-old junior high school student in December 1965 when she and a group of students decided to wear black armbands to school to protest the war in Vietnam. The school board got wind of the protest and passed a preemptive ban. When Mary Beth arrived at school on Dec. 16, she was asked to remove the armband and was then suspended.

Four other students were suspended as well, including her brother John Tinker and Chris Eckhardt. The students were told they could not return to school until they agreed to remove their armbands. The students returned after the Christmas break without armbands, but in protest, they wore black clothing for the remainder of the school year — and filed a First Amendment lawsuit.

Represented by the ACLU, the students and their families embarked on a four-year court battle that culminated in the landmark Supreme Court decision. Dan Johnston, a young lawyer also from Des Moines and just out of law school, argued the case.

On Feb. 24, 1969, the court ruled 7-2 that students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.”

6 0
3 years ago
President Kennedy appointed Thurgood Marshall to
mihalych1998 [28]

Answer:

In 1961, President John F. Kennedy appointed Marshall to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following actions supports the philosophy of capitalism?
Semenov [28]
<span>
A politician demands that the government eliminate regulations on how much pollution a business can create.

</span>
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Supreme Court case Marburg v. Madison happens because
Readme [11.4K]

I dont really know that much about history but i will try my best to

help you

4 0
3 years ago
How were the D-Day invasions planned? What were the setbacks? Why were the Allied invasions of France so important? What, in you
lara [203]

Answer:

D-Day invasions plan introduced by the Allied group to re-take France from Nazi Germany.

Explanation:

During the Second World War, D-Day planned to begin with Paratroopers dropping into France before the invasion. Their goal was to re-take France from the hands of Germans. Allied forces pushed Germans back and caused Germany to fight a two-front war. It was one of the military assaults in history that required extensive planning with troops from American, British and Canadian. The outcome was the victory on the Allies side during the D-Day Normandy landings.  The invasion has called for starting the end of the war in Europe.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What group of people did benjamin franklin refer to as "aliens"?
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!
    9·1 answer
  • Which sentence best describes economic globalization?
    11·2 answers
  • Why is obeying the law the most important duty of any citizen?
    11·1 answer
  • The family line of Jesus is established in Isaiah. True False
    14·1 answer
  • After world war 2, the communist party led by
    15·2 answers
  • The trends in military personnel and state revenue shown in the table are best understood in the context of which of the followi
    6·1 answer
  • Enslaved Africans in English colonies resisted slavery by:
    14·2 answers
  • How were aristocratic women of Ancient Egypt portrayed in the art of the Old Kingdom, Middle Kingdom, and New Kingdom
    15·1 answer
  • What was true about the red summer of 1919
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!