1) It was quite necessary not only for Buck, but also for others struggling to survive in the wild North. If he hadn't killed Spitz it it could have been very dangerous for others because he was very aggressive due to the hunger. Even though he was the leader, blinded by hunger he could do anything to survive, forgetting about the rest of dogs.
2) If he hadn't died he could have get many other innocent lives, like he had done to Curley. This character yielded to the external conflict of the harsh wild conditions, and his instings were much more powerful than his sense of justice so he could have bring harm until he reached his own safety.
Not too sure, but I take it that the book satisfies his need for imagination temporarily, but also awakens a tier of satisfaction to be met, be it for more imagination or not.
Roosevelt's use of rethoric in this excerpt advances his viewpoint in the followinf way:
By using parallel structure, Roosevelt draws attention to the reasons he is concerned about the dictators who have taken power in parts of Europe.
He presents six different noun phrases, all with the same grammatical form: <em>international generosity, return of true independence, world disarmament, freedom of expression, freedom of religion </em>and<em> good business.</em>
By using parallel structures, the text remains readable and clear, which helps to get the message across without any sort of confusion.
Answer:
dlxlgiztRUUeUezfixgoxhlcjhkyiydits
