Answer:
The market rate of return on the stock is 12.55%
Explanation:
Computing the market rate of return on the stock is as:
Selling price of common stock = Expected price per share / (Rate of return [R] - Dividend)
where
Selling price of common stock is $26.46
Expected price per share is $2.00 per share
Dividend is 5.0%
Putting the values above:
$26.46 = $2.0 / (R - 5%)
$26.46 = $2.0 / (R - 0.05)
R - 0.05 = $2.0 / $26.46
R - 0.05 = 0.0755
R = 0.0755 + 0.05
Rate of return = 0.1255 or 12.55%
The answer is A. The subsidiary borrows money from Hong Kong banks
The one that has limited liability for its owners, but passes income through to its investors and avoids double taxation is option C. S Corporation. Read below about S Corporation.
<h3>What is S Corporation?</h3>
A variation on the standard corporation model is the S corporation. An S corporation passes its income through to its owners, so that the entity itself does not pay income taxes. The owners report the income on their tax returns, thereby avoiding the double taxation that arises in a regular C corporation.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above
learn more about S corporation: brainly.com/question/13187927
#SPJ1
The complete question goes thus:
Which of the following has limited liability for its owners, but passes income through to its investors and avoids double taxation
A. C Corporation
B. Partnership
C. S Corporation
D. Types of Business Entities
Answer:
substantial performance.
Explanation:
From the question we are informed about painter which contracts to paint the exterior of the home for $1,750 plus the cost of paint and any other necessary materials. About three-fourths of the way through the job, the contractor breaks his leg and can't finish. The owner offers to pay the contract price less deductions for the cost of having the job completed by another painter, and the original painter accepts the offer. In this case, the contract has been discharged under the principle of substantial performance.
Substantial performance can be regarded as a term that is been
used as regards contract law, it is a principle that can be explained as
degree of performance of a contract that is not regarded as complete or full performance, but regarded as nearly equivalent which will be considered to be unfair if the contractor is denied the agreed payment in the contract.
