1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DaniilM [7]
3 years ago
6

With the two alliance systems of NATO and the Warsaw Pact, what could happen if a nation from one of the alliance systems attack

ed a nation from an opposing alliance system?
History
1 answer:
Mama L [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Hope this helps! If it doesn't let me know!

Explanation:

In 1949, the prospect of further Communist expansion prompted the United States and 11 other Western nations to form the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). The Soviet Union and its affiliated Communist nations in Eastern Europe founded a rival alliance, the Warsaw Pact, in 1955. The alignment of nearly every European nation into one of the two opposing camps formalized the political division of the European continent that had taken place since World War II (1939-45). This alignment provided the framework for the military standoff that continued throughout the Cold War (1945-91).

A Divided Europe

Conflict between the Western nations (including the United States, Great Britain, France and other countries) and the Communist Eastern bloc (led by the Union of Soviet Socialists Republics or USSR) began almost as soon as the guns fell silent at the end of World War II (1939-45). The USSR oversaw the installation of pro-Soviet governments in many of the areas it had taken from the Nazis during the war. In response, the U.S. and its Western allies sought ways to prevent further expansion of Communist influence on the European continent. In 1947, U.S. leaders introduced the Marshall Plan, a diplomatic initiative that provided aid to friendly nations to help them rebuild their war-damaged infrastructures and economies.

 NATO continued its existence beyond the Cold War era and gained new member nations in Eastern Europe during the late 1990s. That development was not well received by leaders of the Russian Federation and became a source of post-Cold War tension between the East and the West.

Events of the following year prompted American leaders to adopt a more militaristic stance toward the Soviets. In February 1948, a coup sponsored by the Soviet Union overthrew the democratic government of Czechoslovakia and brought that nation firmly into the Communist camp. Within a few days, U.S. leaders agreed to join discussions aimed at forming a joint security agreement with their European allies. The process gained new urgency in June of that year, when the USSR cut off ground access to Berlin, forcing the U.S., Britain and France to airlift supplies to their sectors of the German city, which had been partitioned between the Western Allies and the Soviets following World War II.

The discussions between the Western nations concluded on April 4, 1949, when the foreign ministers of 12 countries in North America and Western Europe gathered in Washington, D.C., to sign the North Atlantic Treaty. It was primarily a security pact, with Article 5 stating that a military attack against any of the signatories would be considered an attack against them all. When U.S. Secretary of State Dean Acheson (1893-1971) put his signature on the document, it reflected an important change in American foreign policy. For the first time since the 1700s, the U.S. had formally tied its security to that of nations in Europe–the continent that had served as the flash point for both world wars.

The original membership of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) consisted of Belgium, Britain, Canada, Denmark, France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal and the United States. NATO formed the backbone of the West’s military bulwark against the USSR and its allies for the next 40 years, with its membership growing larger over the course of the Cold War era. Greece and Turkey were admitted in 1952, the Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany) in 1955 and Spain in 1982. Unhappy with its role in the organization, France opted to withdraw from military participation in NATO in 1966 and did not return until 1995.

The formation of the Warsaw Pact was in some ways a response to the creation of NATO, although it did not occur until six years after the Western alliance came into being. It was more directly inspired by the rearming of West Germany and its admission into NATO in 1955. In the aftermath of World War I and World War II, Soviet leaders felt very apprehensive about Germany once again becoming a military power–a concern that was shared by many European nations on both sides of the Cold War divide.

In the mid-1950s, however, the U.S. and a number of other NATO members began to advocate making West Germany part of the alliance and allowing it to form an army under tight restrictions. The Soviets warned that such a provocative action would force them to make new security arrangements in their own sphere of influence, and they were true to their word. West Germany formally joined NATO on May 5, 1955, and the Warsaw Pact was signed less than two weeks later, on May 14. Joining the USSR in the alliance were Albania, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, the German Democratic Republic (East Germany), Hungary, Poland and Romania. This lineup remained constant until the Cold War ended with the dismantling of all the Communist governments in Eastern Europe in 1989 and 1990.

You might be interested in
at the end of the Civil War, General Sherman was called a traitor to the north because of his generosity to the defeated South.
leva [86]
Are there any answer choices?
3 0
3 years ago
How are subsidies similar to tariffs?
USPshnik [31]

Answer: a. Both aim to disadvantage imports

Explanation:

Subsidies are given to companies in order to boost their production and reduce prices of goods.

Tariffs are taxes on imported goods. This raises the prices of the imports. The importance of both subsidies and tariffs is that both of them is to discourage imports and protect the local industries.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Romans excelled in all of the following except a.engineering b.architecture c.sculpture d.oil on canvas
saveliy_v [14]

Answer – Oil on Canvas

 

The Romans excelled in engineering, they made a great fit in architecture, and their sculpture was exotic just like the Greeks. However, they didn’t excel much in oil on canvas paintings. Due to natural disasters, most of the ancient Roman paintings are extinct.

3 0
3 years ago
According to the supreme​ court, at pretrial release hearings the accused enjoys the right​ to:
Fantom [35]

According to the Supreme Court, in the preventive release hearings the accused enjoys the right to be out of jail, while his case is pending. A bond is a contract in which a defendant pays to get out of jail.

In preventite release hearings, they focus more on the general conditions of bail to ensure certain objectives while the defendant is on bail. These pretrial objectives may include protecting the community from the crime, ensuring the safety of the victim and ensuring the appearance of the accused at later dates in court.

The success or lack of success of a defendant can influence the decision of a judge later during the sentence.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Although Federalists and Republicans engaged in extremely bitter political struggles during this period, they both retained thei
denis23 [38]

What shared beliefs and experiences enabled them to keep the nation together, despite their deep disagreements?

Despite their differences, the Republicans and the Federalists always agreed with the fact that the new Constitution was needed because the Articles of Confederation caused a series of troubles because of the lack of a central government. The Constitution came in 1788 and this new country needed to become strong in the eyes of other countries. This was the main purpose that united both Republicans and Federalists. In 1800s Presidential power switched hands to the Republican party with the win of Jefferson, who said in his inauguration that <em>“We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists”</em>.

Was there ever a serious danger that the new federal government could have collapsed in civil war?

Yes, if the Confederacy won the war the new federal government would have collapsed because there would be a huge possibility for other states to leave the Union.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What tactic proved instrumental in William’s gaining power during the First Northern War in 1655?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did the kingdom of Songhay, the successor state to Mali, begin to thrive economically?
    14·1 answer
  • The "fab four" was another name given to which rock-and-roll group?
    13·1 answer
  • What does Lincoln metaphor “a house divided against itself cannot stand”mean
    7·2 answers
  • Before the Civil War, Texas objected to high tariffs because the tariffs led to
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not true of American cowboys?
    10·2 answers
  • The historic event in May, 1999 was a <br> (A) tornado (B) centennial (C) bombing (D) plane crash
    10·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of the Pershing expedition?
    14·2 answers
  • For an economy to move out of a recession, people must ___________.
    14·2 answers
  • Was the US Supreme Court’s decision fair and benevolent to Dred Scott and his family? Why?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!