There are three different versions of the creation of man according to the Maya: men built from mud, wood, and maize. The first two options weren't acceptable to the gods because they couldn't worship their creators. For this reason, they decided to destroy those versions because they were incapable of giving the necessary praise to the gods who created them.
The first version of man was made from mud. They weren't productive, couldn't think (have rational thinking) and move. Also, they weren't mortals. The gods destroyed this first version of people with water.
The second version was made of wood. In this case, the gods made women from reeds and men from wood. They were better than the mud version because they behaved like humans, but didn't have souls and didn't worship the gods. They were immortals, so their destruction was made from an inundation of boiling hot water.
The third version was made from maize. Humans were made of the blood of the gods as well as white and yellow maze dough. It was the most similar to who we are today.
The correct answer is "the Nazca decorated their pottery with bold colors and a mix of figures". The Nazca developed various objects of pottery, gold articles and cotton fabrics. However, the gigantic drawings of animals, plants and geometric shapes built with stones represent one of the most important and still intriguing achievements made by the Nazca. By its proportionality, the set of works nazca can only be seen from the top of the sky.
A. Hieroplyphics is the answer :)
1. Different people with different backgrounds can create input of ideas and mindset which are diverse and might be innovative to the group where those individuals are inserted in. For example, imagine an office where there is a problem with heat due to an AC malfunctioning, some of the people who work there might come from very warm countries and they might know methods to reduce the temperature of the building. They can input ideas about architecture where the heat is easily dissipated from the office.
2. Some people in the Philippines have a different time to show up in a non-formal meeting, as a gather in a public space to spend time with friends. This might be understood as a lack of care about the other people involved in the meeting. Especially, if a European is invited. This might influence the meetings in restaurants and bars, causing frustration if this knowledge is not spread between the foreigners.
i think it would be analysing blas
