Answer:
He travelled with pilgrims, merchants, and ambassadors, to ensure that there would be a warm welcome to places he visited, and to expand his influence.
Explanation:
Battuta was exploring many kingdoms, and as a sign of peace, showing that he meant no harm frequently visited royal courts. To ensure hospitality and that no misunderstandings occur he would bring ambassadors to communicate the situation to kingdoms. Sometimes, he would take an active role in government, often employed as a judge (qadi), administrator, and/or ambassador during his stops. He also brought merchants for trading and pilgrims through much of his travelling in the Arabic World. He was known for his connections to royals and married many women during his travels.
Answer:
No, Stalin was not successful in achieving the goals described in the passage.
Explanation:
Stalin policies in the Soviet Union were successful in bringing the transformation of the country from an agricultural state, to an industrial powerhouse. However, in doing so, Stalin did not give more power to the Soviet people, let alone emancipate them from oppression.
In fact, the opposite is true, during his rule, Stalin concentrated more power in the hands of the Soviet State, and used this power to oppress the people in many ways. One example of this were the gulags: forced-labor concentration camps located in Siberia where Stalin sent people who he thought were enemies of the states, from journalists, to intellectuals, to artists, to businessmen, to even common farmers.
<span>The colonists used nonviolent resistance. They printed many pamphlets as well (including Paine's), and much letter writing was done to England to petition for the redress of grievances. For the second question, the answer is that independence was common sense because it was the only rational course of action against an oppressive monarchy.</span>
It developed the first written legal code of law by king Hammurabi
This excerpt explains why the Articles of Confederation needed to be fixed or replaced with a different constitution. The excerpt goes over several different flaws in the Articles of Confederation including:
1) No national courts to solve issues between individuals from different states.
2) No consistency in laws- In other words, states got to interpret the laws whatever way they wanted.
3) No way to enforce court rulings from state to state.
These weaknesses, plus others, resulted in the need for a new constitution. The US Constitution replaces the Articles of Confederation and is still what we follow today.
