1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
I am Lyosha [343]
3 years ago
14

Which of these is most directly responsible for job loss in the united states

History
1 answer:
OLga [1]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Cheap imported goods are responsible for job loss in the United States.

Explanation:

  • Citing a recent report by Ball State University's Center for economic and business Research, Griswold noted that 85 percent of a loss of manufacturing jobs since 2000 was primarily due to improved economic growth. Only a fascinating twist has been revealed.  
  • Imported goods are international products and services purchased by citizens, businesses, and then another government of the country.  
  • They and are imports if they're generated in a foreign country to domestic consumers. Even the imported goods are tourism goods and services.

You might be interested in
If you were to group the events from 1789 through 1865 into a single period, which of the following names would best describe it
Alinara [238K]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What does a historian typically do immediately after forming a historical question
aleksandrvk [35]

research it in as much depth as possible

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
7. To what did the "final solution" refer to?
Andreas93 [3]
The final solution during World War Two was hitlers plan for mass extermination of the Jewish people by using the gas chambers where he could kill ultimately millions of Jews and other minorities.
7 0
3 years ago
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
tekilochka [14]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
What are consequences of globalization?
Oksi-84 [34.3K]

Globalization must be expected to influence the distribution of income as well as its level. So far as the distribution of income between countries is concerned, standard theory would lead one to expect that all countries will benefit. Economists have long preached that trade is mutually beneficial, and most of us believe that the experience of widespread growth alongside rapidly growing trade in the postwar period serves to substantiate that. Similarly most FDI goes where a multinational has intellectual capital that can contribute something to the local economy, and is therefore likely to be mutually beneficial to investor and recipient. And a flow of capital that finances a real investment is again likely to benefit both parties, since the yield on the investment is expected to be higher than the rate of interest the borrower has to pay, while that rate of interest is also likely to be higher than the lender could expect at home since otherwise there would have been no incentive to send it abroad. Loose talk about free trade making the rich countries richer and poor countries poorer finds no support in economic analysis.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • WILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    8·2 answers
  • Why where the americans fighting against the british?
    14·2 answers
  • Why were scribes important in sumerian society
    14·1 answer
  • when did the U.S government begin passing laws ,such as the clean water Act and the safe drinking water act ,to protect fresh wa
    11·1 answer
  • Don't answer this question
    13·2 answers
  • In the 1800s, the US established forts west of the Mississippi River from Louisiana to Minnesota to establish peace among warrin
    5·2 answers
  • Hitler Quickly took over much of Europe by launching a _____
    9·2 answers
  • Inventor of the traffic signal
    7·1 answer
  • ) Restricting immigrants from entering a country may be based on what belief?
    10·1 answer
  • What happened during the Compromise of 1877?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!