Answer:
The answer is A
enforcement of equal pay for equal work.
Explanation:
hope this helps and have a great day.
The answer is c (all goods)
- The correct answer is D. Substantive due process. The reason is simple, by passing the law, Congress has facilitated the compliance of federal authorities with the principle of procedural due process (the principle that if the government is going to deprive a person of life, liberty and/or property they have to follow the proper procedures as per the laws and the Constitution). Normally, the Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable search and seizure. However by passing this law Congress has bypassed such protections by stating that searching the home of anyone suspected of terrorism without a warrant is valid under the new law. However, the principle of Substantive Due process is clear: the fact that procedural due process was respected under the new laws does not prevent such law from being unconstitutional as it violates the Fourth amendment.
Answer:
The three-fifths compromise was a big component of the Connecticut Compromise. Since the compromise said that representation in the House of Representatives was to be based on population, the “value” of a slave had to be defined. In particular, smaller states did not think larger states with more slaves should be allowed to consider slaves as part of their population. A compromise was reached: a slave would count as three-fifths of a person when counting population for representation.
Answer:
yes
counter culture of the 60s fought for equal pay, equal rights, voting rights, and protested the Vietnam war
March on Washington 1963 ( l have a dream speech)
civil rights act of 1964
Women's Rights and the Civil Rights Act of 1964
voting rights act of 1965
anti Vietnam protests like in DC in 1967
Women qualify for affirmative action in 1967
military draft ended 1973
Explanation:
wikipedia
