Answer:
The doctrine of <u>stare decisis</u> requires courts to follow authoritative prior decisions when ruling on a case.
Explanation:
The answer is stare decisis because it is a principle that states that the same situations should be approach in the same form. According to this, a court has to adhere to the precedent that was established by another court as the decisions that have been taken by a court in the past turn into authority for similar issues that may arise later.
Answer:
In the 1930s, a serious drought, combined with excessively intensive farming practices, transformed the U.S. Great Plains into a dust bowl, wreaking economic devastation on farmers and their communities. The fertile topsoil that fed a nation was, quite literally, blowing in the wind.
Explanation:
The option that is an example of spillover costs is A. a manufacturer continues to pollute a river because it does not pay the costs for cleaning it.
<u>'Spillover costs' refers to a consequence that affects a third party that has not taken part in a decision</u>. In other words, 'spillover costs' makes reference to the damage provoked by another person to a third party. This idea is often used to talk about pollution, as it happens in option A). In this case,<u> the consequences of pollution experienced by the third party, who must pay the costs for cleaning pollution, are the spillover costs</u>.
