With the spending on wars, the aggregate demand falls and the curve will shift towards the left because the production of other goods will reduce in the economy.
<u>Explanation:</u>
When the government of a country spends on the war or the making of the weapons for the war, then the overall working of the economy is affected because the production of goods and services reduces compared to the normal production of goods and services.
With the fall in the production of the goods and the services, the demand also reduces because the overall income of the economy falls. The resources are used to produce war weapons and not consumer goods thus leading to fall in employment, income and so on. Thus the demand curve will shift to the left.
We’re the problem bro sorry can’t help you bud
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
A suitable table or calculator is needed.
One standard deviation from the mean includes 68.27% of the total, so the number of bottles in the range 20 ± 0.16 ounces will be ...
0.6827·26,000 = 17,750 . . . . . within 20 ± 0.16
__
The number below 1.5 standard deviations below the mean is about 6.68%, so for the given sample size is expected to be ...
0.66799·26,000 = 1737 . . . . . below 19.76
_____
<em>Comment on the first number</em>
The "empirical rule" tells you that 68% of the population is within 1 standard deviation (0.16 ounces) of the mean. When the number involved is expected to be expressed to 5 significant digits, your probability value needs better accuracy than that. To 6 digits, the value is 0.682689, which gives the same "rounded to the nearest integer" value as the one shown above.
Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
yes
You gotta put -7y +6x = to the slope of line W