The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2) declares that the Constitution, federal legislation adopted in accordance with it, and treaties signed in accordance with its authority are the "supreme Law of the Land" and supersede any conflicting state laws.
It stipulates that state constitutions are subordinate to the supreme law and that state courts must abide by it.
Thus, Option A is correct.
<h3>Why did the Supremacy Clause come into being?</h3>
The provision gave the Supreme Court the power to support the creation of a robust federal government. The U.S. Constitution's Supremacy Clause was added because the Articles of Confederation did not have one. According to the Articles, state laws could not and did not take precedence over federal legislation.
For more information about Supremacy Clause refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/13839329
#SPJ4
<u>Answer:
</u>
Depending on the data regarding the air quality indices, the changes can be chosen to be incorporated or not incorporated.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The change in the air quality indices and its effect on the national income would be needed to be devised correctly if it has to be incorporated.
- The data obtained on air quality is highly vulnerable to fluctuation based on the methods of data collection.
- As it is difficult to measure the impact of changed air quality indices on the economy, its incorporation in national income is also difficult.
Answer:
Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.Explanation:
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Urbanization can be defined as the development of a place or region into an urban area. According to history Urbanization has its root at first in Europe continent before spreading to America and the time in which the world record more urbanization was during the period known as greco-roman period.
Because of railways and the presence of iron ores boosted the urbanization in the United States of America.
One particular organization that fought for racial equality was the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) founded in 1909. For about the first 20 years of its existence, it tried to persuade Congress and other legislative bodies to enact laws that would protect African Americans from lynchings and other racist actions. Beginning in the 1930s, though, the NAACP's Legal Defense and Education Fund began to turn to the courts to try to make progress in overcoming legally sanctioned discrimination. From 1935 to 1938, the legal arm of the NAACP was headed by Charles Hamilton Houston. Houston, together with Thurgood Marshall, devised a strategy to attack Jim Crow laws by striking at them where they were perhaps weakest—in the field of education. Although Marshall played a crucial role in all of the cases listed below, Houston was the head of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund while Murray v. Maryland and Missouri ex rel Gaines v. Canada were decided. After Houston returned to private practice in 1938, Marshall became head of the Fund and used it to argue the cases of Sweat v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma Board of Regents of Higher Education.
