1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ad libitum [116K]
3 years ago
7

The correlation between the height and weight of children aged 6 to 9 is found to be about r = 0.8. Suppose we use the height x

of a child to predict the weight y of the child. We conclude that:
a. the least-squares regression line of y on x would have a slope of 0.8. about 80% of the time, age will accurately predict weight.
b. height is generally 80% of a child’s weight.
c. the fraction of variation in weights explained by the least-squares regression line of weight on height is 0.64.
Mathematics
1 answer:
Andrew [12]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}

The value of r is always between -1 \leq r \leq 1

And we have another measure related to the correlation coefficient called the R square and this value measures the % of variance explained between the two variables of interest, and for this case we have:

r^2 = 0.8^2 = 0.64

So then the best conclusion for this case would be:

c. the fraction of variation in weights explained by the least-squares regression line of weight on height is 0.64.

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we know that the correlation between the height and weight of children aged 6 to 9 is found to be about r = 0.8. And we know that we use the height x of a child to predict the weight y of the child

We need to rememeber that the correlation is a measure of dispersion of the data and is given by this formula:

r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}

The value of r is always between -1 \leq r \leq 1

And we have another measure related to the correlation coefficient called the R square and this value measures the % of variance explained between the two variables of interest, and for this case we have:

r^2 = 0.8^2 = 0.64

So then the best conclusion for this case would be:

c. the fraction of variation in weights explained by the least-squares regression line of weight on height is 0.64.

You might be interested in
PLS HELP!!!! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!
Marysya12 [62]
(3,0) (-4,0)

not for sure but still mark brainliest cause i need it ✋ im doing bad rn
3 0
3 years ago
Let S be the surface defined by x 2 + 2y 3 + 3z 4 = 6. Let T be the surface defined parametrically by r(u, v) = (1+ln u, 2e v+u−
aleksandrvk [35]

The tangent to C through (1, 1, 1) must be perpendicular to the normal vectors to the surfaces S and T at that point.

Let f(x,y,z)=x^2+2y^3+3z^4. Then S is the level curve f(x,y,z)=6. Recall that the gradient vector is perpendicular to level curves; we have

\nabla f(x,y,z)=(2x,6y,12z^2)

so that the gradient of f at (1, 1, 1) is

\nabla f(1,1,1)=(2,6,12)

For the surface T, we have

\begin{cases}1+\ln u=1\\2e^v+u-2=1\\uv+1=1\end{cases}\implies u=1,v=0

so that \vec r(1,0)=(1,1,1). We can obtain a vector normal to T by taking the cross product of the partial derivatives of \vec r(u,v), and evaluating that product for u=1,v=0:

\dfrac{\partial\vec r}{\partial u}\times\dfrac{\partial\vec r}{\partial v}=\left(u-2ve^v,-1,\dfrac{2e^v}u\right)

\left(\dfrac{\partial\vec r}{\partial u}\times\dfrac{\partial\vec r}{\partial v}\right)(1,0)=(1,-1,2)

Now take the cross product of the two normal vectors to S and T:

(2,6,12)\times(1,-1,2)=(24,8,-8)

The direction of vector (24, 8, -8) is the direction of the tangent line to C at (1, 1, 1). We can capture all points on the line containing this vector by scaling it by t\in\Bbb R. Then adding (1, 1, 1) shifts this line to the point of tangency on C. So the tangent line has equation

\vec\ell(t)=(1,1,1)+t(24,8,-8)=(1+24t,1+8t,1-8t)

7 0
3 years ago
If someone help me that be awesome
nevsk [136]
The answer is 12,600,000... hope this helps any :3
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Angela works at a job that pays $9.46 per hour. She works for 30 hours per week.
lozanna [386]

Answer:

$13,622.4

Step-by-step explanation:

$1,135.2(what she gets paid per month) *12 (months per year)

4 0
3 years ago
What is the nth term rule of the quadratic sequence below?
ludmilkaskok [199]
The answer is a multiple of + 4 for each number resting
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • HELP PLEASE. When finding the surface area of a composite figure, why is it often necessary to subtract sides common to each ind
    7·1 answer
  • And airplanes at altitude change -378 ft over 7 minutes what was the mean change of altitude in feet per minute?
    13·1 answer
  • What 21/12 in simplest form
    10·2 answers
  • PLS HELP THIS IS DUE TONIGHT
    14·2 answers
  • Problem<br> Find the solution set of the inequality<br> \qquad12-6x &gt; 24.12−6x&gt;24.
    9·1 answer
  • 1) (-8,-8), (8,4)<br> Find the slope of the line through each pair of points
    14·2 answers
  • A scale drawing of a kitchen is shown below. The scale is 1:20.
    9·1 answer
  • The measures of three angles in a triangle are as follows:
    15·2 answers
  • A teacher surveys a sample of students from Lake Middle School. He asks the students where they’d like to go for a field trip. H
    5·1 answer
  • Please help me please
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!