1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mars1129 [50]
3 years ago
9

Compare and contrast the Sermon of Pope Urban II at Clermont with Ibn al-Zaki’s account of A Khutba on the Recovery of Jerusalem

.
History
1 answer:
Len [333]3 years ago
3 0

The Sermon of Pope Urban II at Clermont and the Ibn al-Zaki’s account of A Khutba on the Recovery of Jerusalem are very much alike. The first one, pronounced in 1095, was a call for all the great lords and knights of Christianity, especially those in the Council of Clermont, French and German, to recover the sacred land of Jerusalem from the hands of the heathens, the Muslims. The Pope encouraged them to leave everything behind to engage in this sacred war, a war ordered by God, and promised the fighters forgiveness of all their sins. This became the first Crusade.

On the other hand, the account on the recovery of Jerusalem was given on 1187, after the Muslims recovered Jerusalem from the hands of the Christians. It's a congratulation to those who fought in that holy war, ordered by God, and a call to keep fighting to erase all trace of the heresy brought by the Christians. So, all in all, both speeches were given by a high authority in both religions, they both claimed to be the real one and viewed the other as a fake, saw the fight for Jerusalem as a holy one.

You might be interested in
Until Copernicus spent years gathering data on the idea that the solar system operated in a spherical manner, and we lived in a
VMariaS [17]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

It took that much time because people were focused first on overcoming the terrible black death plague and had not much time to learn and reason. It was a time for survival.

The other reason is that people had lived so many years believing the religious explanations that characterized the Middle Ages. People had so ingrained those religious systems from the church and it was not easy for them to have the open mind and criteria to accept different or new knowledge. If we add the fact that if people questioned the religious beliefs they were killed by the inquisition, we can understand how difficult was for people to be open to new knowledge.

So it is true that until Copernicus spent years gathering data on the idea that the solar system operated in a spherical manner, and we lived in a heliocentric world, even though the Eastern Hemisphere knew that for 2000 years: So it took the Black Plague and the Renaissance to move things forward.

4 0
3 years ago
The Southern Manifesto was a document that declared the intent of
barxatty [35]

The southern Manifesto was a document that declered the intent of opposition to racial integration of public places.

<h3>Why was there a racial opposition in the South?</h3>

The southern part of the country at the time were the confederates. These people were against a United States where a black man and a white man had equal powers.

The black man was seen as an inferior person and a slave to the white man. Therefore they were not seen as a part of the white society.

Read more on the Southern Manifesto  here:

brainly.com/question/26992110

8 0
2 years ago
Complete this sentence about the ways Buddhism challenged the status quo in South Asia. Drag word(s) below to fill in the blank(
larisa86 [58]

<em>Urban merchants and Kshatriya oligarchs.</em>

<em>Brahman priests and monarchs.</em>

Explanation:

Many of the people who supported Buddhism were urban merchants and Kshatriya oligarchs. These people actually thrived off of Buddhism, and with the increasing of trade, <u>more people would turn to Buddhism</u>, especially the merchants who would trade and travel consistently, spreading the religion even further.

Brahman priests and numerous monarchs actually thought of Buddhism as a threat. <u>The Brahman priests saw Buddhism as an</u><u> </u><u>ultimate enemy</u>, as the Hinduism that the Brahman priests practiced contradicted and went against the Buddhist views. With more people turning to Buddhism, this made Hinduism become more rare and less widespread.

4 0
3 years ago
Which gilded age president was known for his integrity
MaRussiya [10]
Grover Cleveland was known for his honesty,integrety.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List four factors that can shift the position of an equilibrium
ella [17]
Change in concentration, change in pressure change in temperature change in volume
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Some help with history, thanks =]
    8·1 answer
  • The Nile river affected ancient Egyptian life by creating A. Hot wings that blew across the land. B. Lower and upper Egypt. C. R
    12·1 answer
  • Who were the christians that cabeza de vaca met near the gulf of California
    6·2 answers
  • How did the United States acquire the area labeled number 4 on the map?
    12·1 answer
  • I need help on 2 and 3 plz idk how to do the distance between the cities
    15·1 answer
  • What is a bible in a religious point
    14·2 answers
  • Which strategy did Nixon choose in Vietnam?
    12·1 answer
  • What are some important rivers I need to know for my state report
    9·2 answers
  • Explain the similarities and differences between the Antifederalists and the Federalists.
    13·1 answer
  • What is the Shariah?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!