1.) It’s missing the subject and verb
2.) We went outside after the rain stopped.
Answer:
A). Maintain a low profile.
C). Be conscious of your body language.
Explanation:
De-escalation, as the term itself, implies the 'limiting or reducing the intensity or advancement of the conflict'. Strategies comprehending such behavior involve some specific measures that are taken for the resolution of the conflicts.
As per the question, the de-escalation strategies personnel can employ to avoid escalations of the 'conflict' and discourage or demotivate captor violence would include 'maintaining a low profile' as it assists one to conceal themselves(as a mark of respect and dignity) and reflect 'calmness'. It would assists to prevent the escalation of the conflict that would propose a peaceful resolution to it. 'Being conscious of your body language' so that it could not reflect any kind of mutiny which may escalate the conflict. Thus, <u>options B and C</u> are correct answers.
1) B
2) D
3) A
4) C
5) C
6) D
7) A
8) B
9) A
10) D
I hope this helps you, please let me know if it does. ☺
The years when Shakespeare left Stratford for London are not very well known, but here are some possible reasons why he might have made the move!
1. An obvious reason for Shakespeare to move would be that there was a ton more theatre in London than Stratford. There were some acting troupes that made it out there, but if Shakespeare really wanted to be an actor and a playwright he needed to be in the big city.
2. Another crazy reason that we have a little proof on is that Shakespeare illegally poached a deer off of Sir Thomas Lucy's land. He then moved to London so that he could escape the punishment for that crime.
3. A possible reason that Shakespeare might have left is because of sickness in Stratford. We know that it spread at least to his son who died years after he moved to England, but it could have been a possibility that there was sickness in the town already that Shakespeare wanted to get away from.
The need for qualified workers did not hamper the organization of work, as shown in the last answer option.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Labor organizations were looking for improvements in the labor sector, which guaranteed labor rights, better wages, and more security.
- However, many people saw this as a way of harming entrepreneurs and tried to fight these organizations.
- Thus, to harm organizations, laws were passed against organizations, accusations of disloyalty to America, and a strong fear that this would increase the price of manufacturing products and that this would increase the price paid by consumers.
However, the need for skilled workers did not harm labor organizations, on the contrary, this need promoted other organizations and ensured safer and more specific work.
Learn more about labor unions:
brainly.com/question/17833295?referrer=searchResults
