Tripartite is the answer i suppose
Answer:
Kohlberg believed people shift back and forth between the six schemas in his three levels of moral reasoning, depending on the circumstances and the person's current level of cognitive development. ... Lawrence Kohlberg believed an individual's moral behavior was an outcome of one's current stage of cognitive development. So TRUE
Explanation:
Although a totalitarian government is generally considered an unproductive and harmful idea, a totalitarian government would be considered more efficient at making decisions than a democratic one, because a democratic government makes decisions based on the people making the decisions through representation of all the different peoples. A totalitarian government, on the other hand, is a political system in which one person holds total control over the state. This would mean that the person would make all the decisions without needing anyone's consent and this would be more efficient, as decisions would be made quicker.
Hopefully this helps please give me a thanks if you got it right :)
The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution allowed President Johnson to send troops to Vietnam, thus waging a war without actually "declaring" it as war. Checks and balances keep the power divided and balanced among government branches; it is the duty of Congress to declare war, so President Johnson waging war without the declaration of war by Congress breaks this system.
Until 1663, and were repealed in 1849.