I believe it is D. <span>the self-serving bias.</span>
Generally, the best way to proceed when you have concerns about the behavior of a colleague is to deal directly with the colleague, unless doing so would compromise a client's confidentiality.
If they continue doing such behavior, we can make it known to those in charge of company ethics. We can provide the evidence of the violations.
If we are unsure whether their behavior is unethical or not, it is better that we may consult with people who are charged with maintenance of ethical standard the concerns you have.
Also direct complain would not help because we may might have misinterpreted the actions of the colleague. So it is better to watch out and deal directly.
To learn more about behavior here
brainly.com/question/8871012
#SPJ4
D because you should always do research upon the topic to get all the facts about the dangers of the canopy roads.
The answer to the given question above is BUILD IN REDUNDANCY. From the term itself "redundancy", notice that Sheena is repeating the same information about Marie Curie in all parts of her speech. From the introduction, to the internal summary and transition, up to the conclusion. In this way, audience would easily recall or remember the highlighted information about the topic.
The answer is: Social class
Social class is generally divided based on how much resources that those people have to influence a change in the society where they lived in.
In almost all modern societies, social class will clearly distinguished by the wealth/money that people possessed. So the society is divided into two, the poor and the rich.
People who had vast amount of wealth, could have larger influence in changing the society because they can funded their activism group or influence the legislation by giving funding to the government representative of their choosing.