(A) because in the first stanza he is lonely then he surrounded with daffodils
The interpretation is used to answer "What does the writer say?" The analysis is used to answer "How does the writer say it?" The evaluation is used to answer "What is the worth of the writer saying it?"
<h3>What is the importance of interpretation, analysis, and evaluation?</h3>
- Makes reading efficient.
- It allows the reader to understand the entire text profoundly.
- It stimulates thought, reasoning and extends the meaning of the text.
Evaluation, analysis, and interpretation are essential for good reading and must be stimulated at all times, allowing a strong and deep communication between the reader, the author, and the meaning of the story.
More information about the importance of reading at the link:
brainly.com/question/24836026
Dispose of, throw away, throw out, clear out, discard, scrap, dump, jettison, divest oneself of
Answer:
true is the correct answer
Answer:
When Orwell relates his experience with the elephant in “Shooting an Elephant” it gives some insight into his own psyche as well as the structure of imperialism. In this moment, he criticizes imperialism, showing that the leaders are controlled by the masses just as much as, if not more so than, the other way around.
He describes himself as being despised by the Burmese people. He is a colonial policeman, and in this role, he is associated with imperial British rule, propped up by the threat of force. (Orwell himself served in the Indian imperial police for a time, so the narrator's voice is likely his own.) When the elephant tears through the bazaar, killing a coolie, the Burmese crowd demands that he shoot and kill it. He does not want to do this, because by the time he arrives on the scene, the elephant has calmed, and no longer poses a threat to anybody. Orwell reflects that, in order to appease the angry crowd, he has to fill the role that they expect of him, which is that of a hated "tyrant." This is the paradoxical nature of empire- he must compromise his morality, become what the Burmese people already think he is, or risk their laughter and scorn. For someone that has already determined that he hates British imperialism, the incident is profoundly unsettling, but in a "roundabout way enlightening." It underscores the duality of empire, a world in which a man like Orwell can, as he says in the account, hold remarkably contradictory feelings:
The incident illustrates that, whatever objections they may have to British rule, imperial officials have to be hated to be respected.
Explanation:
