1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alika [10]
3 years ago
9

Evaluate the extent to which rulers of the early modern era differed in their methods of establishing authority. PLEASE HELP ME

THIS IS SUPPOSED TO BE AN ESSAY!!!
History
1 answer:
Naddik [55]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Rulers of the early modern era differed in their methods of establishing authority in that most of them were absolute monarchs that possessed huge kingdoms due to their conquests and imperialistic ideas.

The early modern era is considered to be from the 15th century to the 18th century and the Age of Enlightenment in Europe. During that period in the history of humanity, Europe was ruled by powerful kings that ruled over many territories in different parts of the world. It was the time of navigation and exploration that made possible the discovery of new routes to India, Africa, and the discovery of the Americas. Kings invested a lot of money in this exploration because it was the way to conquer new lands and exploit their raw materials and natural resources for the benefit of their kingdoms. These Kings -more than leaders- were absolutists that exerted total power over their subjects, who had limited or no rights.

You might be interested in
What did the Meiji claim their land reforms would give the peasants? How did those reforms actually work out?
aniked [119]
Go here!!! https://quizlet.com/114457462/history-chapter-13-vocab-and-notes-flash-cards/


3 0
3 years ago
99 points if you answer this question . and only if its right . i will check lol
V125BC [204]
Fast during holy month,
declaration of faith,
giving charity
 
im pretty sure thats it
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Did the industrial revolution have an overall positive or negative impact on people’s lives?
ivann1987 [24]
The industrial revolution had a positive effect on the peoples life in all means
5 0
3 years ago
Which best describes Andrew Jackson’s opinion on the National Bank
Over [174]
I think it is the second one
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
ok so i actually have a real question now when world war began, the official united states policy was what
nikklg [1K]

Explanation: I dont no

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did all black towns start in ok​
    7·1 answer
  • Edmund Burke was a member of the British parliament who wanted to avoid war with the American colonists. Which statement would h
    6·1 answer
  • In an experiment, you used a solvent to extract fat from hamburger meat. What should you do with the solvent and fat when you ar
    9·1 answer
  • As white settlement increased, the government began to set aside land called ___________ for American Indian groups.
    5·2 answers
  • How did the conflict create tension between colonial militaiamen and british troops?
    14·1 answer
  • Reasons for immigration:
    13·1 answer
  • What two problems arose for the South following the Battle of Chancellorsville?
    7·1 answer
  • What technologies encouraged a stalemate between opposing armies in WWl?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these does the Fifth Amendment specifically prohibit?
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the effects of the printing press was the most historically impactful?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!