Answer:The name Hiroshima is so tied to the atomic bomb that it's hard to imagine there were other possible targets.
But in early 1945, the U.S. was still months away from building its first bomb and certainly didn't know what to hit.
"Should it be a city? Should it be a military installation? Should you be just displaying the bomb, without killing anybody?" These are questions that were yet to be decided, says Alex Wellerstein, a historian at the Stevens Institute of Technology.
Wellerstein has devoted his career to studying nuclear weapons and the decision to use them. He says that in the spring of 1945, the military convened a target committee, a mix of officers and scientists, to decide where the bomb should fall.
The minutes of this committee were declassified years ago — and they show it considered some far less deadly targets. The initial list included a remote military installation and Tokyo Bay, where the bomb would have been detonated as a demonstration.
But the target committee decided those options wouldn't show the world the power of the new bomb."They want people to understand that this is something different, and so picking a place that will showcase how different it is, is very important," Wellerstein says."They want people to understand that this is something different, and so picking a place that will showcase how different it is, is very important," Wellerstein says."They want people to understand that this is something different, and so picking a place that will showcase how different it is, is very important," Wellerstein says.
Explanation:
Answer:
Beginning around the 1890s, new industries in the U.S. Southwest—especially mining and agriculture—attracted Mexican migrant laborers. The Mexican Revolution (1910-1920) then increased the flow: war refugees and political exiles fled to the United States to escape the violence. Mexicans also left rural areas in search of stability and employment. As a result, Mexican migration to the United States rose sharply. The number of legal migrants grew from around 20,000 migrants per year during the 1910s to about 50,000–100,000 migrants per year during the 1920s.
Explanation:
Think of a policy as a plan. We will do B if A happens. The best example I can think of is the policy that the United States does not negotiate with terrorists. That is a policy, but it has been broken, for example, when POW were traded from Guantanimo Bay for US soldiers taken hostage.
<span>A law is legally binding. For example, the President of the United States can veto bills. That isn't a policy. The President doesn't have a guideline that he can veto bills and Congress can't say we will break that "policy" this time. That is the law so they must allow it. </span>
<span>In short, </span>policies<span> are </span>not<span> legally binding. They are "plans". </span>
<span>Laws </span><span>are </span><span>legally binding. They are final and concrete, for the purposes of this discussion.</span>
World War 1. The first world war was an eye opener to many countries, and the world was determined to prevent another such event from happening.
Industrialization affect the fighting in World War I by produced weapons that caused a larger number of deaths than in previous conflicts.
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
Industrialization is recognized as the era where there was huge and major use of machines, technology which helped to improve the efficiency and productivity. With the industrialization, there was advancement in the weapons to be used in wars also.
With the use of such weapons there were large number of deaths compared to number of causalities in the previous wars. There fore there was negative impact of this era of industrialization also along with some positive impact also and this was one of the negative impacts.
