1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Illusion [34]
4 years ago
10

Check Understanding In invalidating preclearance provisions, what larger point was the Supreme Court making about voting rights?

History
1 answer:
Ksenya-84 [330]4 years ago
8 0
The Supreme Court was affirming the point that states (not the federal government) should be in charge of the voting procedures in their states.

The Supreme Court decision you're referring to, which invalidated pre-clearance conditions, was Shelby County v. Holder (2013).  "Pre-clearance" meant that certain states, according to the Voting Rights Acts of 1965, had to get approval in advance from federal authorities for any changes they made to their state regulations regarding voting.  That standard had been applied to several states because they had displayed discriminatory practice in their voting laws.  The decision in Shelby County v. Holder held that the federal government could not keep applying that requirement on the basis of decades-old data.

I recently posted another answer on Shelby County v. Holder, which you can check out too.  Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/9069264#readmore
You might be interested in
What rights were guaranteed to US citizens?
Yuki888 [10]

Answer:

vhg uj,bvcg tlujcyful

Explanation:

yhyhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhn

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements does not describe an effect of Indian removal on the Osage?
goblinko [34]

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

Indian Removal was an act enacted President Andrew Jackson, on May 28, 1830 into the law. According to this act, Native Americans were forced to leave their ancestral lands and move to the western parts of Mississippi river.

It was a forced migraton of Indians by the US government. This act forced the tribes either to accept US newly enforced law or to leave their homes.

<u>The Indian Removal act did not effect Osage as they were not forced out of their lands, </u><u>instead they agreed to renounce their lands in exchange of reserved lands in Oklahoma</u><u>. </u><em><u>This decision ultimately made them the wealthiest Native Americans</u></em><u>.</u>

Thus the correct option is A.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can somebody help me with this ??
Gala2k [10]

I believe the answer is they had important rail and water routes ^^

7 0
3 years ago
When did the 1st slaves arrive in America?
aksik [14]

Answer:

1619

Explanation:

The first 19 or so Africans to reach the colonies that England was struggling to establish arrived in Point Comfort, Virginia, near Jamestown, in 1619, brought by British privateers who had seized them from a captured Portuguese slave ship. Slaves were usually baptized in Africa before embarking.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do you think xerox was able to motivate its employees through the crisis it faced in 2000?
AVprozaik [17]

In 2000, Xerox was in front of insolvency after centuries of misconduct, loads of debt, and rising questions about its bookkeeping practices.  Grounded on a generation of knowledge with Xerox, she knew that the business had influential employees who were not interested when she took over. Mulcahy supposed that among other key company’s changes, inspiring employees at Xerox was a main way to jump start the business back from the edge of failure. One of her supervisory principles was a faith that in order to attain customer satisfaction, staffs must be involved and driven in their work. Mulcahy not only positively saw the business through this problematic time but also was talented to make a stronger and more absorbed business.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Question 1 of 10
    15·2 answers
  • Queen Mary I of England is called “Bloody Mary” because a. she burned 300 protestants at the stake c. she had 6 husbands, 2 of w
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following would not be a role of government in the circular flow of the economy?
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a critical advantage of the allies over the allies over the Axis Powers during world was II? A) the s
    8·1 answer
  • The result of the Wilmot proviso would have been to
    12·1 answer
  • Which three statements about the league of nations are true?
    10·1 answer
  • Which term describes the tendency of a moving object to continue moving at the same velocity unless an unbalanced force acts on
    14·1 answer
  • Which of these economic systems is based on a “command” economy, as opposed to a “free market” economy?
    14·2 answers
  • What are member countries required to do? Are there different requirements for
    8·1 answer
  • Throughout history, people have had different points of view on the nature of government.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!