The answer really depends on whether the farmer is also the landlord or only a worker in the fields, and bearing in mind that the question refers only to Chavez’ reforms, not what is now called Chavismo, that is to say, the rule of President Maduro.
If the first, then there are chances that the landlord would feel threatened about the fact this his land could be —although not necessarily— appropriated by the State, but also, he might feel relieved to learn that his land could be more productive since there would be a lot more subsidies for farming since the oil revenues of the country would again be in the hands of the State.
If it is the second possibility, the farmer most likely would feel relieved altogether since subsidies to labor power and farming would mean greater income and better living conditions for him and his family.
Hello There!
In the trade network, American colonists depended on England for “Factory Goods”
There was many goods that they had.
Answer:
James Cook
Explanation:
James Cook, more commonly referred to as Captain Cook, was an English sailor and pirate who was stealing gold and silver from the Spanish ships, and was delivering it to the queen. Captain Cook is one of the most famous English sailors, and he became legendary because of his actions. While his achievements in the sailing have largely remained behind the curtains because of his piracy, they were many. His piracy was what made him famous though, causing enormous damage to the Spanish, stealing enormous amounts of wealth from them, sinking their ships, and strengthening the English crown in meantime.
Answer:
He would pay a fine.
Explanation:
Using Greenleafable's answer (he/she is a the brainly level Quality Assurance), I am going to say that, "It says in article 198 that hurting a freed man would result in paying a fine. Whipping and things like that happened for other people in the situation or if the man paying the fine did not have the money to pay a fine.
<h2><u>
PLEASE MARK BRAINLIEST!</u></h2>
