Answer:
Present value = $75,379.47
Future value is $91,567.97
Explanation:
a) Present value of cash flow is calculated as:
Present value = $14578.25 + $27,325.69 + $33475.53
Present value = $75,379.47
b) Future value of windfall is calculated as
Future value is $91,567.97
Answer:
c
Explanation:
¿?????????????????????????!!!!???????
Answer:
Solution: the answer in delivered in 2 stages because of the character of dualistic problems:-
Part (1)
As Kent and Craig are concerned during a professional with prospective risk and that they wish to hide their prospective accountability. the character of the industry which can be utmost applicable in corporate against the other variety of industry like individual merchant or partnership company because of the subsequent details:-
Reason I: Unrestricted accountability- just in case of insolvency or industry letdown, Kent and Craig don't seem to be obligated to trade their particular resources.
Reason II: convenience of Business- because of the Supply of additional investment compared to restricted investment in sole profession and partnership company, they're ready to manage with the qualms related to the industry.
Part (2)
Wanting to the purposes of Dave and Cindy, the indebtedness corporation is desirable because of the subsequent details:-
Reason I: No danger to non-public assets because the corporation is proscribed accountability.
Reason II: just one level of tax within the variety of company tax
.
Answer:
Explanation:
Solution-
According to Senator Jones, the elasticity of taxable income is larger, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a greater percentage. Also, according to Senator Smith, the elasticity of taxable income is small, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a smaller percentage.
(I) Under Senator Jones assumptions, due to rise in taxes, the taxable income has risen considerably as compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the estimates of additional revenue from the tax increase will be larger under Senator Jones assumptions, compared to Smith's assumptions.
(ii) Since under Senator Jones assumptions, elasticity of taxable income is large. So due to rise in taxes, there is a significant proportional rise in taxable income under Jone's assumptions compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the costs of the tax increase is borne more under Senator Jones assumptions , compared to Smith's assumptions.
Answer:
The demand for Post Raisin Brand cereal is: ELASTIC
the demand for all types of breakfast cereals is: INELASTIC
Explanation:
To calculate the price elasticity of demand (PED) we can use the following formula:
PED = % change in quantity / % change in price
- If PED > 1, the demand is price elastic
- If PED = 1, the demand is price unitary
- If PED < 1, the demand is price inelastic
*The PED always results in a negative number, e.g. price deceases, quantity increases, but for practical reasons we convert the negative number into a positive (we use absolute values) when we are determining the elasticity.
