Answer + Explanation:
As the society grows more and more health conscious, stronger voices to ban smoking in all public areas begin to emerge. Banning public has been used as a mean for government to discourage smoking and also to improve city image. It is almost impossible to achieve consensus on this issue as it creates great inconvenience for the smokers. However, I believe smoking should be banned in public places and my reasons are as follow.
Looking at the <em>health aspect</em>, smoking should be banned in public places because it is not only a health hazard for the smoker, it creates more harm to the others. Cigarette is a known carcinogen that has been associated with increased rates of lung cancer and heart disease. However, the hazard does not end there, second-hand smoke has been proven to create more detrimental effects on health on both the smokers and the people around them. This is especially harmful for those with weaker immune systems such as children and elderly.
Looking at the <em>sociological aspect</em>, smoking should be banned in public places because smoking is a personal choice. One’s personal enjoyment should not be at the expense of others’ health. When a person smokes in indoor public areas such as restaurants and shopping centres, pollutants continue to circulate the premise and affecting the health of everyone within the building. It is unfair for the non-smokers to be forced to share the health risks of the smokers.
To sum up, public places are shared by all, smokers and non-smokers, old and young, and should be made friendly to all. <u>Negative effects of smoking go beyond the smoker himself, creating health problems of the public.</u> While some choose to accept the side effects of smoking, risks of smoking should not be forced upon others. Therefore, in my humble opinions, smoking should be banned in public places.
Answer:
OB) who traveled into space to take pictures.
Explanation:
A subordinate clause is a clause that adds meaning or detail to the main clause. This type of clause cannot stand on its own as a sentence and needs an independent clause to be taken as a complete sentence. Subordinate clauses are also identifiable by the presence of subordinating conjunction in the sentence.
In the given sentence, "Brian was a photographer" is the main clause while the second part of the sentence is a dependent clause. So, we can easily say that "who traveled into space to take pictures" is the subordinate clause.
Thus, the correct answer is option B.
Photo captions<span>, also known as cutlines, are a few lines of text used to explain or elaborate on published photographs.</span>
Answer: Historical events that serve as a guide for subsequent situations
Explanation:
The phrase “historical precedent” as its used in paragraph 13 mean an historical event that serve as a guide for subsequent situations.
Historical precedent refers to the action or event which has happened before in the past and can be used as an example in the future.