Answer:gsisbebdfjsjsbshxjfjenahshsjebdbd
Explanation:
The Russian revolutionaries wanted something more than famine and injustice -- and that's much of what existed in Russia at that time. They wanted equality for all persons. That was a big goal of the communist agenda, and the Russian Revolution was a communist endeavor. They wanted to achieve that equality both in terms of wealth/property and in terms of political status and rights.
Was it dangerous? Absolutely. The reign of the tsars had gone on in Russia for centuries, and military victory over the tsar's armies had to be won for the revolution to succeed. And it was not going to be easy to make the nation better off, even after the revolution. The people would expect results from the new government. Those results were going to be hard to achieve.
Over time, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), which was the nation brought about by the Russian Revolution, has to become more and more authoritarian and repressive to keep its agenda going. And eventually that agenda failed, when about 75 years after the revolution, the USSR's government collapsed.
C push factors are negative things
Formulation stage of policy making includes promises to the public about new policies.
Option D
Explanation:
The formulation is the suggestion of explications to plan issues. Policy formulation depicting the progression of a plan and explication that addresses the obstacle and that is socially satisfactory and politically appetizing.
Formulation frequently contributes policymakers with numerous options for fixing plan matters. The policy needs to be a real step in resolving the issue most efficiently achievable. The efficient formulation comprises the study and description of dilemmas to resolving issues. Furthermore, policies necessity be politically attainable. In formulation, it is imperative to split the structure down into more inadequate parts and to display the foremost contents to the public
If the British economy is struggling, fewer tourists might visit Kenya.
Explanation:
Great Britain and Kenya are two countries that are on the opposite sides of the economic spectrum. The British have strong, well, developed, highly industrialized economy, being one of the most developed countries in the world. Kenya is a country that only recently started to move in the right direction. It is a developing country, and gradually it is moving forward, but is still way behind the level of the developed countries.
Despite these two countries not sharing a border, and being on different continents, they can have influence on each other when it comes to the economy. For example, Kenya is a country that focuses a lot of tourism, especially safari tourism. This type of tourism is mostly practiced by people from the developed countries, such as Great Britain. If the British economy starts to slow down, and it struggles, the people will lose their economic power, and will be less willing to spend on tourism. This will result in a decrease of tourist in Kenya, and with the tourism being such an important branch in its economy, it can be a big blow.
Learn more about developing countries brainly.com/question/1616250
#learnwithBrainly
