Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Lars is completing a history project about World War I. On the British government's National Archives website, he finds letters from American soldiers as well as documents written by museum curators and historians that give background information about the war, supported by primary sources from their archives' collections.
Which descriptions best characterize this information? Select three options.
a. outdated facts, b. credible sources, c. primary sources, d. biased information
, e. reasoned judgment
Answer:
b. credible sources
c. primary sources
e. reasoned judgment
Explanation:
Primary sources are documents that were made and built at the time the historic event they document is taking place. In that case, they can claim that the letters that American soldiers wrote during the First World War are a primary source.
A credible source is one that is written by an expert on a given subject, in addition, these sources have evidence that supports all the statements they present. When Lars uses historical sources written by curators and historians who used primary sources as evidence, he is using credible feints.
After doing this research, Lars will be able to draw conclusions about the first world war using these sources as evidence, thus making an easoned judgment.
Alright, I'll help you give me a minute to remember my History haha
It was the English. The company was called the Dutch East India Company.
Answer:
The Marshall Court established the legal authority of the Supreme Court over the states and other branches of the federal government.
Explanation:
Answer:
It is not a single unified religion and has no founder, single teacher, nor prophets. Hindus believe in a universal soul or god known as Brahman who is worshipped in many diverse forms. These forms include complementary attributes of male and female deities, in human as well as animal forms.
Explanation:
hope its help
