I believe the answer to your question would be young adults who want to stay healthy.
The sentence from the excerpt that is foreshadowing is Sentence 4 because it foreshadows that Doodle is no longer present in the narrator’s life.
<h3>What is “The Scarlet Ibis”?</h3>
The story is written by James Hurst. It is a sad story about a boy who has a special condition, and he was struggling with it.
The options are attached:
- Sentence 1 because it foreshadows that something tragic happened to the narrator in the distant past.
- Sentence 2 because it foreshadows that the story is primarily about some type of bird.
- Sentence 3 because it foreshadows that something significant happened in either the house or flower garden.
- Sentence 4 because it foreshadows that Doodle is no longer present in the narrator’s life.
Thus, the correct option is D.
Learn more about “The Scarlet Ibis”
brainly.com/question/2645654
#SPJ1
Answer:
I disagree with the statement of not letting children or young adults until a certain age.
If you go around schools asking students what they use social media for, there will most likely be a lot of answers such as “ To mess around when I get bored.” but sometimes children or young adults will say “ To keep in contact with friends or family when I don’t have their phone number.”
There are many reasons to be only social media some good and some bad but if you think about what would everything be like without it. Yes, there most likely would be fewer students on their phones during class. But I’d there was no social media people wouldn’t be able to contact friends that
So it said that 82 percent at Stanford couldn’t tell.
How many students are in your middle school? You need to multiply that by 0.82 and you should have your answer. Be sure to ROUND to the nearest whole number!
Answer:
a. Critical legal studies school of thought
Explanation:
As we can see in the text above, the narrator challenges and criticizes the dogmatic and inflexible rules applied to different situations. This is an inherent characteristic of the Critical legal studies school of thought, which was formed by a group of intellectuals who believed that the law has no neutralities and that it is formed from policies that must be questioned and challenged. These schools of thought preached revolt against the norms and standards described as correct in legal theories and practices.
