The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there is no excerpt attached or another kind of reference, we could say that what Reagan believed was the best way to reduce the risk of war was clearly stating that the United States would never be an aggressor, that the United States do not start conflicts and fights against other territories.
Wha President Reagan said was that "The defense policy of the United States is based on a simple premise: The United States does not start fights. We will never be an aggressor. We maintain our strength in order to deter and defend against aggression – to preserve freedom and peace."
The message was clear, the United States is a powerful nation and will defend the country as well as other countries that could face the threat of Communist aggression. Those were the final years of the Cold War in which the Soviet Union tried to spread Communist in different parts of the world, and the US made everything on its hands to stop it.
Traditionally, the process of independence of Texas has been described as a completely noble struggle to defend and uphold the ideals of democracy, freedom, etc. However, little has been said as of the far more innoble motivations behind many individuals who settled down in Texas with the permission of the Mexican government. As became Mexico in 1821, its democratic government had agreed to allow immigrant from the U.S. to claim large plots of lands where they and their families could make a dignified living as ranchers or farmers, <u>but many of these immigrants had no intention to roll up their shirt sleeves, get their hands dirty and earn their everyday bread with the sweat on their foreheads: they speculated on real state from the very beginning, breaking the law in the process by claiming more lands than allowed</u>.
It is true that the government in Mexico took a bad turn for dictatorship in 1835, which prompted a number of states such as Zacatecas, Yucatan, Texas, etc. to secede from the country. However, a great number of Texans at the time speculated about the potential advantages of joining the U.S. Against the deal that every immigrant accepted into Texas had made with Mexico, as of not joining the U.S., Texans sent a delegation to the U.S. requesting for assistance. Later on, after the battles at El Alamo and San Jacinto in 1836, the Texan revolutionaries, who had captured president of Mexico and chief commander of the Mexican Army, Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna, the Treaties of Velasco signed by Sam Houston, Texans' leader and Santa Anna, recognized the independence of Mexico, even though the Mexican congress never ratified it.
No take trump for example he never has done anything right for a different race besides his own , this from a white person
emperor was a figurehead
stable society
class system
the shogun held the power to rule japan
I don't know the rest
Answer:
The attitude of an unfair peace and US non-involvement in the League of Nations help set up the foundations for a new world conflict because, since the United States did not join, the League of Nations was not respected, and no one followed followed the rules of peace set by Woodrow Wilson; the United States wished to stay away from European involvement. Germany was also left to the unfair blame of causing the war and having to pay everyone back for the casualties for the war, bringing about an attitude of unfair peace in Europe.
Explanation:
