Answer: (C) Explain how members of the public who disagree with the holding in Gonzales v. Raich could act to limit its impact.
Explanation: I did the Quiz:D
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
The difference between a University and a TVET College is that a University offers full degrees and the total experience of being on campus, with teachers, labs, proper facilities, extensive programs, extracurricular activities, athletics, intramural and recreational sports, and tons of more activities. Of course, the price is high studying at universities.
TVET stands for Technical and Vocational Education and Training. It is an educational institution that exists in countries such as South Africa. They offer some technical short careers and when graduating, students do not receive a diploma, they get a certificate.
The educational programs can last from six months to three years, depending on the career o area of education.
Of course, the tuition and expenses are cheaper than a formal university.
The stigma around these kinds of colleges is that they are not as good as universities or do not have a quality level of education because they teach technical careers.
But that is not the issue. This TVET exists to fulfill a different necessity for people. Some students can't afford a university and by enrolling in a TVET, they can learn a lot of practical things they can use in their jobs.
Answer: No, both countries deployed large parts of their military forces to fight under the flag of another country.Yes, the U.S. military never directly engaged in these proxy wars.No, both countries still fought in proxy wars but not directly against each other.Yes, by definition, a proxy war means that there was no direct involvement of either nation.
The first bomb, dropped on the city of Hiroshima on 6 August 1945, resulted in a death toll of around 135,000. The second, which hit Nagasaki on 9 August, killed at least 50,000 people – according to some estimates, as many as 74,000 died.<span>It was certainly a reasonable view for the USA to take, since they had suffered the loss of more than 418,000 lives, both military and civilian. To the top rank of the US military the 135,000 death toll was worth it to prevent the “many thousands of American troops [that] would be killed in invading Japan” – a view attributed to the president himself.</span><span>the US wasn’t justified. Even secretary of war Henry Lewis Stimson was not sure the bombs were needed to reduce the need of an invasion: “Japan had no allies; its navy was almost destroyed; its islands were under a naval blockade; and its cities were undergoing concentrated air attacks.”</span><span>The atom bombs achieved their desired effects by </span>causing maximum devastation<span>. Just six days after the Nagasaki bombing, the Emperor’s Gyokuon-hōsō speech was broadcast to the nation, detailing the Japanese surrender. The devastation caused by the bombs sped up the Japanese surrender, which was the best solution for all parties.</span>
A/Allied forces captured a few strategic pacific islands from the Japanese and then used those reclaimed islands as bases from which to advance the remaining targets -Apex
