I believe the answer is: A microhistorian might document one day in a town that experienced particularly high unemployment levels, while a comparative historian might graph unemployment levels in several cities throughout the Great Depression.
Microhistorian tend to choose that method because they tend to favour a more intensive research within smaller unit of research (such as villages, small neighbourhood, etc). Comparative historian on the other hand, might choose that method because they favour research technique that collect as many data as possible from one segment of historical period and compared it with the another.
During the early part of the 21st century, the U.S. military was deployed to Central Asia and Middle East in order to build stable democracies and to remove dictators in oppressive states.
<h3>Whi is a dictator?</h3>
It should be noted that a dictator simply means a ruler who doesn't abide with existing rules and doesn't really care about its people.
In this case, during the early part of the 21st century, the U.S. military was deployed to Central Asia and Middle East in order to build stable democracies and to remove dictators in oppressive states.
Therefore, the correct option is D.
Learn more about dictator on:
brainly.com/question/14412840
#SPJ1
I believe it’s D, since we were at war with Iraq at the time. Why would we help them?
Negotiating international peace treaties
