Answer:
irst supporting and then repudiating Mexican regimes during the period 1910-1920.[1]
Explanation:
The United States involvement in the Mexican Revolution was varied and seemingly contradictory, first supporting and then repudiating Mexican regimes during the period 1910-1920.[1] For both economic and political reasons, the U.S. government generally supported those who occupied the seats of power, whether they held that power legitimately or not. A clear exception was the French Intervention in Mexico, when the U.S. supported the beleaguered liberal government of Benito Juárez at the time of the American Civil War (1861-1865). Prior to Woodrow Wilson's inauguration on March 4, 1913, the U.S. Government focused on just warning the Mexican military that decisive action from the U.S. military would take place if lives and property of U.S. nationals living in the country were endangered.[2] President William Howard Taft sent more troops to the US-Mexico border but did not allow them to intervene in the conflict,[3][4] a move which Congress opposed.[4] Twice during the Revolution, the U.S. sent troops into Mexico.
The European forces race each other to assert arrive in Southeast Asia since they craved the land for its key area along the ocean courses to China and their wellsprings of tropical agribusiness, minerals, and oil.
The following are the three thought processes behind the European race for the provinces:
1. economic
2. socially/religious
3. politically/militarily
Answer:
A. C,A,B
gndfgjfdngjndfpgjn (sorry just need that to answer)
Answer:
temperance, abolition of slavery, and education for women and girls. These are the causes that descirbes the causes women reformers and activists focused on before the suffragist movement. Women had been actively fighting for the right to vote, the campaign for women’s suffrage began in earnest in the decades before the Civil War.\
The main way in which the Seven Years War did this was because although the war technically ended in a British Victory, the British suffered heavy losses--meaning that the colonists saw that the British were at least somewhat militarily vulnerable.
