1. The blacks believe they have everything handed to them and they never have to lift a finger for anything’s because they are well educated and well dressed, example would be that the narrator mugs a white man and to get the other man to help me lies and says that the white men don’t care about uneducated poor black men.
2. No because the man was just doing it because he was starving and needed food before he died so he was willing to do anything. At the end he ended up not even getting any money for food because he was tricked and lied too. Most likely he blames the narrator because he lies to him and tricks him. The narrator does it out of selfishness because he has learned his way around things because of how long he’s been on the streets.
The actual classification is very difficult.
<span>Strong is very open ended. You can be physically strong, but morally corrupt. </span>
<span>Capable suggests a skill that is above adequate. You can be a warrior that is capable but he couldn't add two single digit numbers together. </span>
<span>Mighty has the same problem. </span>
<span>I would pick </span><span>capable, strong, and mighty </span>
This is the definition
archaic past and past participle of work.
The style is called "Call and Response" : )
<span>The point of view London uses in "The Call of the Wild" is the third person limited omniscient.
</span> Omniscient means that the narrator has access to character's thoughts and feelings
Buck’s point of view, for the most part; because London focuses on the character of Buck. He explains the <span>the dog's thoughts and feelings.</span> <span>
the novel also shifts briefly into </span>John Thornton’s point of view during his wager involving Buck’s ability to pull a heavy sled
