1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gayaneshka [121]
3 years ago
15

The radius of a cylindrical water tank is 4 ft , and its height is 10 ft . What is the volume of the tank?

Mathematics
1 answer:
Paha777 [63]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

2010 cu ft to the nearest whole number.

Step-by-step explanation:

Volume = π r^2 h

= 3.14 * 4^3 * 10

= 2009.6

You might be interested in
Angle a​ and​ ​angle b​ ​are complementary angles. The measure of ∠a is 42°.
Citrus2011 [14]
My work to your question
8 0
3 years ago
Let us consider a sequence <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Crm%20a_%7Bn%7D" id="TexFormula1" title="\rm a_{n}" alt="\rm a_{n
kirill115 [55]

Hi there,

a_{5}=2850

Please check the attached image for answer.

<em>Hope </em><em>it </em><em>helps </em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em>

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Consider the following proposed proof by contradiction that for all positive integers n, 3n &gt; 2.
laila [671]

Answer:

The proof contains a simple direct proof, wrapped inside the unnecessary logical packaging of a proof by contradiction framework.

Step-by-step explanation:

The proof is rigourous and well written, so we discard the second answer.

This is not a fake proof by contradiction: it does not have any logical fallacies (circular arguments) or additional assumptions, like, for example, the "proof" of "All the horses are the same color". It is factually correct, but it can be rewritten as a direct proof.

A meaningful proof by contradiction depends strongly on the assumption that the statement to prove is false. In this argument, we only this assumption once, thus it is innecessary. Other proofs by contradiction, like the proof of "The square root of 2 is irrational" or Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes, develop a longer argument based on the new assumption, but this proof doesn't.

To rewrite this without the superfluous framework, erase the parts "Suppose that the statement is false" and "The fact that the statement is true contradicts the assumption that the statement is false. Thus, the assumption that the statement was false must have been false. Thus, the statement is true."

7 0
3 years ago
Whats is the 39th triangular number
aleksandr82 [10.1K]

Answer:

The 39th triangle number is 780

7 0
2 years ago
People pls stop reporting you downloaded the app so don’t complain about what’s on it :)
Nikitich [7]

ohhhh that sounds interesting

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A cleaner recommends mixing 1 1/2 cup of cleaner for every 12 cups of water. What is the ratio of cleaner to water in simplest f
    9·2 answers
  • Plzplzplz please help
    14·1 answer
  • Select the postulate that is illustrated for the real numbers.
    12·2 answers
  • PLS ANSWER AND LOOK UNDER THE QUESTION TOO :)))
    14·2 answers
  • How many times does 85 go into 221<br> Explain Thx!!
    8·2 answers
  • Can somebody please help me with this question
    7·1 answer
  • Select the slope (m) and y-intercept (b). 2x+y=4
    8·1 answer
  • Who can pls follow me on rblx im trying to get 100 followers pls follow me tysm if you will :D
    6·1 answer
  • Define Interquartile Range.<br><br> I will check for plagiarism.
    5·2 answers
  • El resultado de 9x^2 + 81 = 0
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!