1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elena-2011 [213]
3 years ago
10

In the 2000 Bush v. Gore decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that

History
1 answer:
miss Akunina [59]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The Supreme Court, in a per curiam opinion, ruled that the Florida Supreme Court's decision, calling for a statewide recount, violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This ruling was by a 7–2 vote, though per curiam opinions are usually issued only for unanimous votes.

Explanation:

correct me if i am wrong

You might be interested in
If there is a republican president and a republican congress, then there will likely be
Alexxx [7]
A.) a conference committee for debate 
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are three examples of failures of American democracy for African Americans and others in modern times?
Nutka1998 [239]

<u>Prior to 1950's, the African-Americans were treated extremely unequally in the USA and denied equality through law</u><u> </u><u>Archives are a record of any administrative data, historical information or a collection of documents aimed at providing knowledge about the past through the accounts maintained over an extended period of time.</u>

7 0
3 years ago
How did Thomas Hobbes’s interpretation of the social contract differ from John Locke’s?
user100 [1]

Answer:

  • Hobbes' interpretation of the social contract believed human beings were inherently at odds with each other and therefore needed an authoritarian government to rule over them.
  • Lockes' interpretation of the social contract believed that human beings are morally neutral by nature, and can live side by side without a government -- but that creating a government makes society better.

Explanation:

Both English philosophers, Hobbes and Locke, believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan</em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and harmful toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government</em> in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching about Hobbes and Locke, I've often described the difference between them in this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

5 0
3 years ago
What loopholes existed in the 18th Amendment? *
LiRa [457]

Answer:

The biggest loophole was that neither the Eighteenth Amendment nor the Volstead Act made it illegal to drink or be drunk in public. Farmers who grew fruit quickly learned to sell their harvests in dehydrated bricks. The warning label included instructions on how to easily turn the bricks into alcoholic drinks.

3 0
3 years ago
Historically, how many parties have composed america's political party system
Andrei [34K]
The answer is two political parties.  

Over the years, parties have went through identity crisis.   
(Today news like to exaggerate like this is something new, but it is not!)  
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Whose ideas are most closely associated with the term "dictatorship of the proletariat"?
    11·2 answers
  • May I please have help can some please help
    14·1 answer
  • What's the correct answer?
    13·1 answer
  • Which new means of sending messages long distance put the Pony Express out of business after just 18 months
    10·2 answers
  • What was Taj Mahal used as​
    9·2 answers
  • Compare and contrast the ideologies of conservatism, liberalism, and nationalism.
    7·2 answers
  • What caused the rise of the Italian city-states?
    15·1 answer
  • According to Marxist theory which three conditions would lead to a communist society? Select all the correct answers
    9·2 answers
  • Describe the characteristics that a stable civilization might have
    11·1 answer
  • Why was agriculture the worst mistake in human history?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!