1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anna71 [15]
3 years ago
7

Suppose that the U.S. government decides to charge wine consumers a tax. Before the tax, 50,000 bottles of wine were sold every

week at a price of $5 per bottle. After the tax, 44,000 bottles of wine are sold every week; consumers pay $6 per bottle (including the tax), and producers receive $2 per bottle. The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $ per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $ per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $ per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if
Business
1 answer:
grigory [225]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

$4

$1 and $3

False

Explanation:

As per the data given in the question,

a)

Amount of tax for each bottle is $4 because the sellers are receiving $2 and buyers are paying $6. Therefore,

Amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $6 - $2 = $4

b)

Burden on the consumer = $6 - $5

= $1

Burden on the seller = $4 - $1

= $3

c)

False, because the tax incidence depends on the flexibility or elasticity  of market.

You might be interested in
Susan bought a new sweater on sale for dollar 28.93.she was charged HST of 13%.find the total amount of her bill including taxes
Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

The answer is 32.69$.

Explanation:

The Sale price of sweater was $28.93, to add 13% HST we need to multiply 28.93 by 13 % & add 28.93 to it.

8 0
3 years ago
All the payroll information needed to prepare payroll and tax reports is found on
Kruka [31]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
(Scenario 4-2: Production of Wheat and Toys) Given the information provided, one can determine that Country A has an absolute ad
Arte-miy333 [17]

Answer:

wheat, wheat

Explanation:

In the field of economics, absolute advantage may be defined as the ability of a producer to produce a particular goods or services at large amount or quantity at the same price or the same quantity at a very low price as compared to other producers. It means producing goods efficiently.

Whereas a comparative advantage of a product is defined as the ability of a producer to produce more goods and and consumes less of it at a lower opportunity cost when compared to its competitors.

Thus in the context, Country A has both an absolute advantage as well as comparative advantage in production of wheat.

4 0
3 years ago
Suppose for a given consumer the marginal utility (MU) of a pizza is 100 utils and the MU of a hamburger is 80 utils, and that t
NemiM [27]

Answer:

<u>is not</u> , <u>consume more of hamburgers</u>

Explanation:

A consumer is said to have achieved equilibrium when within his budget constraint, he purchases that combination of two goods which yield maximum satisfaction to him.

The equation for consumer equilibrium for two products is given by

\frac{MU_{x} }{P_{x} } = \frac{MU_{y} }{P_{y} }

In the given case, \frac{MU_{x} }{P_{x} } = \frac{100}{15} = \frac{20}{3} = 6.666

                            \frac{MU_{y} }{P_{y} } = \frac{80}{10}    = 8

wherein, x= pizza

              y= hamburger

As is evident, the marginal utility per dollar spent is greater in case of a hamburger, the consumer is not in a state of equilibrium.

Thus, he should consume more units of Hamburgers in order to maximize his utility.

3 0
3 years ago
A common defense known as _______ arises when a consumer knows that a defect exists but still proceeds unreasonably to make use
melomori [17]

Answer:

The correct answer is: Assumption of the risk.

Explanation:

If the risk inherent in a particular action that caused an injury is knowingly and voluntarily assumed, you cannot sue anyone to recover the damages. Suppose, for example, a situation in which he went to a friend's house and was warned about the use of the back door because the floor cover was seriously damaged and would not support a person's weight on it. If you have decided to ignore the warning and use the back door, the doctrine of risk taking will probably prevent the recovery of injuries sustained by a fall on that floor. The court will decide that you "assumed the risk" of such injury.

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Munchkin is a popular baby clothing brand. The founder of the company, Isabel, conducts a brainstorming session with her employe
    11·1 answer
  • A 4-year project has an annual operating cash flow of $54,000. At the beginning of the project, $4,500 in net working capital wa
    5·1 answer
  • The Holmes Company's currently outstanding bonds have an 8% coupon and a 10% yield to maturity. Holmes believes it could issue n
    12·1 answer
  • 1) Based on the video, which type of
    8·1 answer
  • High income countries with larger governments as a share of gdp have generally
    12·1 answer
  • If you consider the Loanable Funds Theory, does the current interest rate make sense when you consider things such as the nation
    7·1 answer
  • A decrease in the interest rate due to an increase in the supply of loanable funds is referred to as the __________ effect.
    9·1 answer
  • When a u.s. company purchases and imports electronic parts from china to use to produce mp3 players within the united states, th
    5·1 answer
  • Saturn Industries purchased and consumed 64,000 gallons of direct material that was used in the production of 17,000 finished un
    6·1 answer
  • Brief Exercise 229 Iverson Company purchased a delivery truck for $45,000 on January 1, 2020. The truck was assigned an estimate
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!