Answer:
used an analogy
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question Terry seems to have used an analogy to solve his problem. An Analogy is a comparison between one to completely different things. Since he thought the cake looked like the a bridge he saw previously he used the bridges support system design in order to hold up the cake.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
Standing committee
Explanation:
Standing committee is also referred to as permanent committee. These are committees formed within the house of representatives and senate.
The standing committee usually take receipt of proposed bills, and then they determine if it should be sent to the floor of the house for further deliberation.
The conducted experiment of Horselenberg et al. (2003) is a replication of the Kassin and Kiechel (1996) findings. They used the classic computer crash paradigm wherein they falsely accused the participants of touching the forbidden keys and used a pseudo-eyewitness who insisted they saw the participants touched the forbidden keys. With all the variables they explored: individual difference in compliance, suggestibility, fantasy proneness, dissociation, and cognitive failures; their findings suggest that only fantasy proneness has a relationship with false confessions. The result of this experiment shows that false confessions really occur; and that it is easy to make the participants confess because of the pseudo-eyewitness as evidence that made them internalize they really had touched the forbidden keys that resulted to the computer crash.
Many items are made out of silk such as shirts, dresses, ties blouses, robes, gun powder bags, and pajamas.
*Hope I Helped*
Answer: Pragmatic inference
Explanation:
pragmatic inference, when the message of a speaker goes beyond the logical or literal meaning, a pragmatic inference is needed.
