Answer:
The British seemed unbeatable. During the previous 100 years, the British had enjoyed triumph after triumph over nations as powerful as France and Spain. At first glance, the odds were clearly against the Americans. A closer look provides insight into how the underdogs emerged victorious. Britain's military was the best in the world. Their soldiers were well equipped, well disciplined, well paid, and well fed. The British navy dominated the seas. Funds were much more easily raised by the Empire than by the Continental Congress. Some of those funds were used to hire Hessian mercenaries to fight the Americans. The Americans had tremendous difficulty raising enough funds to purchase basic supplies for their troops, including shoes and blankets. The British had a winning tradition. Around one in five Americans openly favored the Crown, with about half of the population hoping to avoid the conflict altogether. Most Indian tribes sided with Britain, who promised protection of tribal lands.
Explanation:
Answer:
Isolationism was stronger after the depression
Explanation:
After WWI, USA became more active economically and military in aid for Europe's countries in post-war recovery. This meant that many European countries depended on US loans to recover. After the crash in 1929, USA became more conscious about their own economy and stopped participating in European conflicts. This encouraged countries such as Germany or Japan to take action in order to expand territory, which gave place to the raise of fascism in these countries (Japan's INnvasion of China in 1937 and Germany's annexation of Czechoslovakia in 1938, for example)
Thats easy its because when they have kids and they die the kids will rule the same way which keeps the country running but if they dont have a heir then someone from the government will become king and mess up the government.
Answer:
Those governments resist change, demonstrating that substantial challenges remain before us. Democratization in Eurasia faces many challenges. Progress continues to be measured largely in terms of civil society development; political reform remains stalled – and some states are in fact backsliding.
Explanation:
