What was the primary reason for the economic recession in Europe following World War I?

History

1 answer:

Alex73 [517]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The primary reason for the economic recession in Europe following World War I was due to the decline in the economic activities in the United States.

This was because the activities and plans achieved during the war had to undergo some modifications after the war which resulted in a certain degree of economic deterioration. Although it occurred for a short while after which economic boom occurred.

You might be interested in

In 1990 which country invaded Kuwait causing the United States and United Nations to intervene?

Reika [66]

In 1990 the country that invaded Kuwait causing the United States and United Nations to intervene is Iraq.

3 0

2 years ago

Did Islam spread peacefully or violently? Explain your answer

melisa1 [442]

Answer:

Mark me as brainiest3 Please

Explanation:

Islam was and still is being spread by violence and coercion. 1400 years after it was invented by Mohammed.

No religion is spread peacefully.

7 0

2 years ago

How were kennedy and johnson different as presidents

Lorico [155]

Answer: However, there were several differences between them. Kennedy was from the North, Johnson from the South. Kennedy was part of a very affluent crowd, Johnson was a simple Texan. Johnson spent his whole childhood in Texas, while Kennedy traveled throughout his life due to his father’s Ambassadorial assignments and his many jobs. They were similar, and yet different. The USA’s 35th and 36th presidents were shaped by the events and encounters of full lives.

8 0

2 years ago

1) All life is full of suffering, pain, and sorrow. 2) The cause of suffering is nonvirtue, or negative deeds and mindsets such

liberstina [14]

The Four Noble Truths would be the correct answer. These are the Four Noble Truths.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following describes a difference between the arguments made by Chief Joseph and Commissioner Parker in the excerpts

Radda [10]

Answer:

The answer is: Chief Joseph believed that Native American tribes had a right to sovereignty, while Commissioner Parker believed that Native American tribes were not sovereign nations.

Explanation:

Chief Joseph was the leader of an indigenous group of people called "Wal-lam-wat-kain," a Native American tribe.

Commissioner Ely S. Parker was a lieutenant of the American Civil War. He became the Commissioner of Indian Affairs which meant that he was responsible for managing the lands that was entrusted by the USA to the Indian tribes, Alaska Natives and American Indians.

The difference between Chief Joseph's and Commissioner Parker's arguments was that the Chief believed that Native American tribes had a right to sovereignty, while Commissioner Parker believed that Native American tribes were not sovereign nations.

For Parker, none of the tribes could guarantee them of a governance whereby people would obey the law. For him, it was a great deal of harm that the government of the USA allowed the Indians to believe that they were sovereign or independent nation. Because of this, Chief Joseph resisted the Americans when they negotiated with them to relocate to a reservation.

8 0

2 years ago