It should be noted that key points are usually indicated in the first or last paragraph of a literary work.
<h3>
What is a key point?</h3>
Your information is incomplete. Therefore, an overview of the topic will be given. A key point in literature simply means the main idea, theme, or central idea. It's simply the main point that the author wants to convey to the refers.
In this case, to identify the key point, identify the main idea and the important details that support it. It's also important to understand the underlying meaning of the passage.
Learn more about central ideas on:
brainly.com/question/2684713
Answer:
look around the word to see how it is used
replace the word with a more familiar word
Explanation:
It is common to read a text that has an unknown word, or difficult to understand, which makes it difficult to understand the text. The most common in these cases is for the reader to look for a dictionary that shows the meaning of the reading, but this can disrupt the reading pace. To avoid this, the reader can observe the words that are presented around the unknown word and identify the context that these words present. Through this context, the reader can understand what the meaning of the unknown word is and how it fits into that sentence.
The reader can also replace this unknown word with a similar word that he knows the meaning of. However, be careful with this strategy, as there are many false cognates in the language, which are similar words that have different meanings.
ngl that sounds like a nice start point for a poem or a story!... i might do one rn lol
but its kinda sad that during both world wars most of the soldiers were young men
In the first text, Zimbardo argues that people are neither "good" or "bad." Zimbardo's main claim is that the line between good and evil is movable, and that anyone can cross over under the right circumstances. He tells us that:
"That line between good and evil is permeable. Any of us can move across it....I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil--to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein. It's the situation that brings that out."
Zimbardo argues that people can move across this line due to phenomena such as deindividualization, anonymity of place, dehumanization, role-playing and social modeling, moral disengagement and group conformity.
On the other hand, Nietzsche in "Morality as Anti-Nature" also argues that all men are capable of good and evil, and that evil is therefore a "natural" part of people. However, his opinion is different from Zimbardo in the sense that Nietzsche believes that judging people as "good" and "bad" is pointless because morality is anti-natural, and we have no good reason to believe that our behaviour should be modified to fit these precepts.
