The last one cause if you pair it with a word that’s a noun........ yeaaaaaaaa now you know
It can be inferred here that the author insinuates that computers are getting better at what humans do especially translating languages. A counterclaim or assertion is posited where in the human, out of fear of redundance asserts "we're still good for something".
<h3>What is the textual evidence that indicates that the author is comparing computers and the ability of humans is?</h3>
Computer: A Computer Can Now Translate Languages as Well as a Human:”
Humans: “We’re still good for something”
<h3>What is textual Evidence?</h3>
The evidence from a text that supports the assertion made by that text is called textual evidence.
Textual evidence can also be used to buttress inferential claims.
Learn more about inference:
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
Hello. This question is incomplete and unfortunately it is not possible to answer it that way. However, when searching for this question I found a very similarity and I believe it is a question like yours. The complete question is in the attached image.
Answer:
The letter B is the right answer.
Explanation:
Among the options presented in the question below, we can consider the letter B as the correct option, since it does not present plagiarism, it is correctly punctuated, it is coherent, it presents all the information from the original sentence and it has an appositive clause "an EMT who writes on the subject "that identifies who Rory Hill is. It is important to emphasize that an appositive phrase is one that presents additional information, which enriches the reader's understanding of what is being read.
A simple subject will often have modifiers<span> before or after it, but, once these are removed, the word left is the simple subject.</span>