Ramesh examined the pattern in the table. Powers of 7 Value 7 Superscript 4 2,401 7 Superscript 3 343 7 Superscript 2 49 7 Super
script 1 7 7 Superscript 0 1 7 Superscript negative 1 StartFraction 1 Over 7 EndFraction Ramesh says that based on the pattern 7 Superscript negative 5 = negative 16,807. Which statement explains whether Ramesh is correct? Ramesh is correct because 7 Superscript negative 5 is equivalent to Negative 7 times (negative 7) times (negative 7) times (negative 7) times (negative 7), which has the same value as Negative 16,807. Ramesh is correct because as the exponents decrease, the previous value is divided by 7, so 7 Superscript negative 5 = 1 divided by 7 divided by 7 divided by 7 divided by 7 divided by 7 = negative 16,807. Ramesh is not correct because 7 Superscript negative 5 is equivalent to StartFraction 1 Over 7 Superscript 5 EndFraction, which has the same value as StartFraction 1 Over 7 Superscript 4 EndFraction divided by 7 = StartFraction 1 Over 7 cubed EndFraction = StartFraction 1 Over 343 EndFraction. Ramesh is not correct because as the exponents decrease, the previous value is divided by 7, so 7 Superscript negative 5 = 1 divided by 7 divided by 7 divided by 7 divided by 7 divided by 7 = StartFraction 1 Over 16,807 EndFraction. NEED HELP NOW PLEASE I HAVE ONLY SEEN WRONG ANSWERS
To find 20% of 30 you first can find 10% which is when you move the decimal one place to the right so you would get 3. 3 is 10% the to find 20% you multiply that (3) by 2 and get the answer of 6